Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24475848›Full record

ArticleRadiology2014

Cartilage lesion score: comparison of a quantitative assessment score with established semiquantitative MR scoring systems.

Hamza Alizai, Warapat Virayavanich, Gabby B Joseph, Lorenzo Nardo, Felix Liu, Hans Liebl, Michael C Nevitt, John A Lynch, Charles E McCulloch, Thomas M Link

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Radiology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed
3.6field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 49 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Medial meniscus tears are most prevalent in type I ACL tears, while type I ACL tears only account for 8% of all ACL tears.Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA · 2023
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Hamza AlizaiFrom the Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging (H.A., W.V., G.B.J., L.N., H.L., T.M.L.) and Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics (F.L., M.C.N., J.A.L., C.E.M.), University of California-San Francisco, 185 Berry St, Suite 350, San Francisco, CA 94107; and Department of Radiology, University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, San Antonio, Tex (H.A.).
Warapat Virayavanich
Gabby B Joseph
Lorenzo Nardo
Felix Liu
Hans Liebl
Michael C Nevitt
John A Lynch
Charles E McCulloch
Thomas M Link
University of California, San Francisco · US

Funding

Translation of Quantitative Imaging in OsteoarthritisP50AR060752 · NIAMS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI SOUZA, RICHARD BRIAN · 2011 to 2015
$6.2M
T2 Relaxation Time of Knee Cartilage in the OAI Incidence SubcohortU01AR059507 · NIAMS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI LINK, THOMAS M · 2010 to 2012
$499k
CLINICAL CENTERS FOR THE OSTEOARTHRITIS INITIATIVE-N01AR22260N01AR022260 · NIAMS · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH · PI KWOH, KENT · 2002 to 2006
–
DATA COORDINATING CENTER FOR THE OSTEOARTHRITIS INITIATIVE-264022258N01AR022258 · NIAMS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SYS OFFICE/PRES · 2003 to 2003
–
CLINICAL CENTER FOR THE OSTEOARTHRITIS-264022262-264022262N01AR022262 · NIAMS · THE MEMORIAL HOSPITAL · PI ASSAF, ANNLOUISE R. · 2002 to 2006
–
CLINICAL CENTERS FOR THE OSTEOARTHRITIS INITIATIVE-N01AR22261N01AR022261 · NIAMS · OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY RESEARCH · PI JACKSON, REBECCA · 2002 to 2006
–
CLINICAL CENTERS FOR THE OSTEOARTHRITIS INITIATIVE-264022259-264022259N01AR022259 · NIAMS · UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND AT BALT · PI HOCHBERG, MARC C. · 2002 to 2006
–
NIAMS NIH HHS N01-AR-2-2258NIAMS NIH HHS N01-AR-2-2259NIAMS NIH HHS N01-AR-2-2260NIAMS NIH HHS N01-AR-2-2261NIAMS NIH HHS N01-AR-2-2262NIAMS NIH HHS P50 AR060752NIAMS NIH HHS U01 AR059507
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo describe a scoring system for quantification of cartilage lesions (Cartilage Lesion Score [CaLS]), to determine its reproducibility, to examine the association of CaLS-detected longitudinal change with known risk factors for osteoarthritis (OA) progression by comparing a group of subjects with OA risk factors with a group of subjects without OA risk factors, and to compare the CaLS system with the established semiquantitative Whole-Organ Magnetic Resonance Imaging Score (WORMS) and Boston-Leeds Osteoarthritis Knee Score (BLOKS) systems in terms of detection of cartilage defect progression. MATERIALS AND

methodsAll subjects provided written informed consent, and the local institutional review board approved this HIPAA-compliant study. Fifty-two subjects with and 25 subjects without risk factors for knee OA were randomly selected from the Osteoarthritis Initiative. Inclusion criteria were age of 45-60 years, body mass index of 19-27 kg/m(2), and no knee pain or OA on radiographs at baseline. Baseline and 24-month follow-up right knee 3-T magnetic resonance images were analyzed with WORMS, BLOKS, and CaLS systems. Progression of cartilage lesions with each scoring system was compared by using multilevel mixed-effects linear-regression models. κ values were calculated to determine reliability.

resultsIntraclass coefficient values for inter- and intraobserver reliability of the CaLS system were 0.86 and 0.91, respectively. Interobserver κ value range for individual features was 0.81-0.94. The CaLS system enabled significantly higher detection of cartilage lesion progression than did WORMS or BLOKS systems (P < .001); 51.8% (56 of 108), 17.6% (19 of 108), and 13.0% (14 of 108) of the lesions progressed when analyzed with the CaLS, WORMS, and BLOKS systems, respectively. With the CaLS system, subjects with OA risk factors had significantly higher odds of progression than did subjects without risk factors (odds ratio, 2.78; P = .005).

conclusionThe CaLS system is a reproducible scoring system for cartilage lesions that yields an improved detection rate for monitoring progression when compared with detection rates of semiquantitative WORMS and BLOKS systems.

Indexed as

Severity of Illness IndexCartilage, ArticularFemaleHumansLongitudinal StudiesMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleMiddle AgedOsteoarthritis, KneeReproducibility of ResultsRisk Factors

Identifiers

PMID24475848
PMCPMC4263635
OpenAlexW2135354625

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.