Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24475777›Full record

Trial reportBMC neurology2014

Fingolimod (FTY720) therapy in Japanese patients with relapsing multiple sclerosis over 12 months: results of a phase 2 observational extension.

Jun-ichi Kira, Yasuto Itoyama, Seiji Kikuchi, Qi Hao, Takayoshi Kurosawa, Kazuo Nagato, Isao Tsumiyama, Philipp von Rosenstiel, Lixin Zhang-Auberson, Takahiko Saida

Registry-linked trialAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase IIMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMC neurology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT00670449 (An Extension of the 6-month, Double-blind, Randomized, Placebo-controlled, Parallel-group, Multicenter Study Comparing Efficacy and Safety of FTY720 0.5 mg and 1.25 mg Administered Orally Once Daily in Patients With Relapsing Multiple Sclerosis), which is not on this map. Cited by 26 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT00670449 phase2completednot on this map

An Extension of the 6-month, Double-blind, Randomized, Placebo-controlled, Parallel-group, Multicenter Study Comparing Efficacy and Safety of FTY720 0.5 mg and 1.25 mg Administered Orally Once Daily in Patients With Relapsing Multiple Sclerosis

TypeinterventionalSponsorNovartisRan2008 to 2012Enrolled143ConditionsMultiple SclerosisArmsFingolimod
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Fingolimod for relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2016
    Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Intracerebral lymphoproliferative disorder in an MS patient treated with fingolimod.Neurology(R) neuroimmunology & neuroinflammation · 2018
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Neurological safety of fingolimod: An updated review.Clinical & experimental neuroimmunology · 2017
    Review
  15. Fingolimod Associated Bilateral Cystoid Macular Edema-Wait and See?International journal of molecular sciences · 2016
    Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Present and Future Therapies in Neuromyelitis Optica Spectrum Disorders.Neurotherapeutics : the journal of the American Society for Experimental NeuroTherapeutics · 2016
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Jun-ichi KiraDepartment of Neurology, Neurological Institute, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kyushu University, Fukuoka, Japan. kira@neuro.med.kyushu-u.ac.jp.
Yasuto Itoyama
Seiji Kikuchi
Qi Hao
Takayoshi Kurosawa
Kazuo Nagato
Isao Tsumiyama
Philipp von Rosenstiel
Lixin Zhang-Auberson
Takahiko Saida

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundA 6-month phase 2 study of fingolimod demonstrated efficacy and safety in Japanese patients with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (MS). Here we report a 6-month observational extension that evaluated efficacy and safety in patients who received fingolimod continuously for 12 months or who switched from placebo to fingolimod.

methodsOf 147 patients who completed the 6-month core study, 143 entered the extension. Those originally randomized to placebo were re-randomized to fingolimod 1.25 mg or 0.5 mg. During the extension, all patients were switched to open-label fingolimod 0.5 mg.

resultsMagnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and relapse outcomes were maintained or improved in patients treated with fingolimod for 12 months versus those treated for 6 months. No new safety events were reported over 12 months of treatment. Infections occurred in similar proportions of continuously treated and switched patients, while cardiac and liver adverse events occurred in fewer continuously treated than switched patients. Four patients were aquaporin-4 (AQP4) antibody-positive, three of whom showed rapid disease exacerbations within 10 days of fingolimod initiation.

conclusionContinuous fingolimod treatment for up to 12 months was associated with maintained or improved efficacy and a manageable safety profile, consistent with that previously seen. Results in a small number of patients suggest lack of benefit in AQP4 antibody-positive patients. Meaningful statistical interpretation was limited by the small sample size in each treatment group, owing to the number of patients who completed the core study.

trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov NCT00670449.

Indexed as

Asian PeopleImmunosuppressive AgentsMultiple Sclerosis, Relapsing-RemittingPropylene GlycolsSphingosineAdolescentAdultDouble-Blind MethodFemaleFingolimod HydrochlorideHumansMaleMiddle AgedTreatment OutcomeYoung AdultFingolimod HydrochlorideImmunosuppressive AgentsPropylene GlycolsSphingosine

Identifiers

PMID24475777
PMCPMC3911956

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.