Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24475434›Full record

ReviewJournal of nephropathology2013

IgM nephropathy; can we still ignore it.

Aruna Vanikar

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of nephropathology, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. IgM nephropathy; time to act.Journal of nephropathology · 2014
    Article
  13. IgM nephropathy: timely response to a call for action.Journal of renal injury prevention · 2014
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Anti-phospholipase A2 receptor antibody in idiopathic membranous nephropathy: New concepts.Journal of research in medical sciences : the official journal of Isfahan University of Medical Sciences · 2013
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

Aruna VanikarDepartment of Pathology, Laboratory Medicine and Transfusion Services and Department of Immunohematology, GR Doshi and KM Mehta Institute of Kidney Diseases & Research Centre, Gujarat, India.
Institute of Transplantation Sciences · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

contextIgM nephropathy (IgMN) is a relatively less recognized clinico-immunopathological entity in the domain of glomerulonephritis , often thought to be a bridge between minimal change disease and focal segmental glomerulosclerosis. EVIDENCE ACQUISITIONS: Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ), Google Scholar, Pubmed (NLM), LISTA (EBSCO) and Web of Science has been searched.

resultsIgM nephropathy can present as nephritic syndrome or less commonly with subnephrotic proteinuria or rarely hematuria. About 30% patients respond to steroids whereas others are steroid dependent / resistant. They should be given a trial of Rituximab or stem cell therapy.

conclusionsIgM nephropathy (IgMN) is an important and rather neglected pathology responsible for renal morbidity in children and adults in developing countries as compared to developed nations with incidence of 2-18.5% of native biopsies. Abnormal T-cell function with hyperfunctioning suppressor T-cells are believed to be responsible for this disease entity. Approximately one third of the patients are steroid responders where as the remaining two thirds are steroid resistant or dependent. Therapeutic trials including cell therapies targeting suppressor T-cells are required.

Indexed as

Focal segmental glomerulosclerosisHypertensionIgM nephropathyMinimal change diseaseProteinuria

Identifiers

PMID24475434
PMCPMC3891147
OpenAlexW1990802067

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.