Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24475325›Full record

ArticleIranian journal of microbiology2013

Comparison of culture and real-time PCR for detection of Bordetella pertussis isolated from patients in Iran.

Vajiheh Sadat Nikbin, Fereshteh Shahcheraghi, Masoumeh Nakhost Lotfi, Seyyed Mohsen Zahraei, Masoumeh Parzadeh

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Iranian journal of microbiology, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Automatic Identification of MALDI-TOF MS Database Using ClassicalComputational and mathematical methods in medicine · 2022
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Alarm Thresholds for Pertussis Outbreaks in Iran: National Data Analysis.Osong public health and research perspectives · 2020
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Molecular detection ofIranian journal of microbiology · 2017
    Article
  8. Epidemiology of pertussis in Denmark, 1995 to 2013.Euro surveillance : bulletin Europeen sur les maladies transmissibles = European communicable disease bulletin · 2016
    Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Laboratory Diagnosis of Pertussis.Clinical microbiology reviews · 2015
    Review
  12. Virulence Factors Variation Among Bordetella Pertussis Isolates in Iran.International journal of molecular and cellular medicine · 2015
    Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Vajiheh Sadat NikbinPertussis Reference Laboratory, Department of Bacteriology, Pasteur Institute of Iran, Tehran.
Fereshteh ShahcheraghiPertussis Reference Laboratory, Department of Bacteriology, Pasteur Institute of Iran, Tehran.
Masoumeh Nakhost LotfiPertussis Reference Laboratory, Department of Bacteriology, Pasteur Institute of Iran, Tehran.
Seyyed Mohsen ZahraeiCenter for Disease Control, Ministry of Health and Medical Education, Tehran, Iran.
Masoumeh ParzadehPertussis Reference Laboratory, Department of Bacteriology, Pasteur Institute of Iran, Tehran.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND

objectiveDue to contagiousness of pertussis, a rapid and sensitive method for diagnosis is required to initiate the treatment and interrupt its transmission. MATERIALS AND

methodsTo detect B. pertussis strains, we used two real-time PCR targeting IS481 and BP283 sequences and compared factors influencing culture and real-time PCR results.

resultsTotally, 779 specimens were collected from patients among which 11 (1.4%) were culture positive. Using IS481 and BP283 primers, 122 (15.6%) and 100 (12.8%) were diagnosed as infected specimens respectively. There were significant relationships between the real-time PCR method for diagnosis of B. pertussis and age, sex and vaccination of patients before sampling.

conclusionThe real-time PCR is superior and much more sensitive than culture for diagnosis of B. pertussis. However, the sensitivity was improved when both IS481 and BP283 were used. Correct sampling and transportation of specimen also improved the detection rate in our research.

Indexed as

Bordetella pertussisBP283IS481real-time PCR

Identifiers

PMID24475325
PMCPMC3895556

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.