Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24475293›Full record

ArticlePloS one2014

Recovery of diaphragm function following mechanical ventilation in a rodent model.

Christian S Bruells, Ingmar Bergs, Rolf Rossaint, Jun Du, Christian Bleilevens, Andreas Goetzenich, Joachim Weis, Michael P Wiggs, Scott K Powers, Marc Hein

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. [Diaphragm dysfunction : Facts for clinicians].Medizinische Klinik, Intensivmedizin und Notfallmedizin · 2018
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Christian S BruellsDepartment of Surgical Intensive and Intermediate Care, and Department of Anesthesiology, University hospital of the RWTH Aachen, University of Excellence, Aachen, Germany.
Ingmar BergsDepartment of Surgical Intensive and Intermediate Care, and Department of Anesthesiology, University hospital of the RWTH Aachen, University of Excellence, Aachen, Germany.
Rolf RossaintDepartment of Surgical Intensive and Intermediate Care, and Department of Anesthesiology, University hospital of the RWTH Aachen, University of Excellence, Aachen, Germany.
Jun DuDepartment of Surgical Intensive and Intermediate Care, and Department of Anesthesiology, University hospital of the RWTH Aachen, University of Excellence, Aachen, Germany.
Christian BleilevensDepartment of Surgical Intensive and Intermediate Care, and Department of Anesthesiology, University hospital of the RWTH Aachen, University of Excellence, Aachen, Germany.
Andreas GoetzenichDepartment of cardiothoracic and vascular surgery, University hospital of the RWTH Aachen, University of Excellence, Aachen, Germany.
Joachim WeisInstitute of Neuropathology and JARA - Translational Brain Medicine, University hospital of the RWTH Aachen, University of Excellence, Aachen, Germany.
Michael P WiggsDepartment of Applied Physiology and Kinesiology, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, United States of America.
Scott K PowersDepartment of Applied Physiology and Kinesiology, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, United States of America.
Marc HeinDepartment of Surgical Intensive and Intermediate Care, and Department of Anesthesiology, University hospital of the RWTH Aachen, University of Excellence, Aachen, Germany.
RWTH Aachen University · DEUniversity of Florida · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMechanical ventilation (MV) induces diaphragmatic muscle fiber atrophy and contractile dysfunction (ventilator induced diaphragmatic dysfunction, VIDD). It is unknown how rapidly diaphragm muscle recovers from VIDD once spontaneous breathing is restored. We hypothesized that following extubation, the return to voluntary breathing would restore diaphragm muscle fiber size and contractile function using an established rodent model.

methodsFollowing 12 hours of MV, animals were either euthanized or, after full wake up, extubated and returned to voluntary breathing for 12 hours or 24 hours. Acutely euthanized animals served as controls (each n = 8/group). Diaphragmatic contractility, fiber size, protease activation, and biomarkers of oxidative damage in the diaphragm were assessed.

results12 hours of MV induced VIDD. Compared to controls diaphragm contractility remained significantly depressed at 12 h after extubation but rebounded at 24 h to near control levels. Diaphragmatic levels of oxidized proteins were significantly elevated after MV (p = 0.002) and normalized at 24 hours after extubation.

conclusionsThese findings indicate that diaphragm recovery from VIDD, as indexed by fiber size and contractile properties, returns to near control levels within 24 hours after returning to spontaneous breathing. Besides the down-regulation of proteolytic pathways and oxidative stress at 24 hours after extubation further repairing mechanisms have to be determined.

Indexed as

Analysis of VarianceAnimalsBlotting, WesternDiaphragmMuscle Fibers, SkeletalRatsRecovery of FunctionRespiration, ArtificialRespiratory MechanicsTime Factors

Identifiers

PMID24475293
PMCPMC3903648
OpenAlexW2052360725

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.