Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24475256›Full record

ArticlePloS one2014

Survival of neural stem cells undergoing DNA damage-induced astrocytic differentiation in self-renewal-promoting conditions in vitro.

Leonid Schneider

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Stem Cells of the Aging Brain.Frontiers in aging neuroscience · 2020
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Stem cells: the pursuit of genomic stability.International journal of molecular sciences · 2014
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Leonid SchneiderIFOM Foundation - The FIRC Institute of Molecular Oncology Foundation, Milan, Italy ; Fachbereich Biologie, Technische Universität Darmstadt, Darmstadt, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We recently reported that neural stem cells (NSCs) become senescent and commit to astrocytic differentiation upon X-ray irradiation. Surprisingly, under self-renewing culture conditions, some of these senescent cells undergo p53-independent apoptosis, which can be suppressed by caspase inhibition and BCL2 overexpression. Inhibition of apoptosis proved beneficial for astroglial differentiation efficiency; hence the toxicity of DNA damage on NSCs was specifically tested in context of the culture conditions. In this regard, self-renewal-promoting culture conditions proved incompatible with terminal astrocyte differentiation and impacted negatively on the viability of NSCs following DNA damage-induced cell cycle exit. On the contrary, a switch to differentiation-supporting conditions ablated apoptosis and conveyed tolerance to DNA damage. Thus, stem cell death has likely not originated from DNA break toxicity, while the potentially confounding effect of stem cell niche should always be taken in consideration in stem cell irradiation experiments.

Indexed as

AnimalsApoptosisAstrocytesBenzothiazolesCell DifferentiationCell SurvivalDiaminesDNA Breaks, Double-StrandedDNA PrimersMiceMicroarray AnalysisNeural Stem CellsOrganic ChemicalsQuinolinesTetrazolium SaltsThiazolesBenzothiazolesDiaminesDNA PrimersOrganic ChemicalsQuinolinesSYBR Green ITetrazolium SaltsThiazolesthiazolyl blue

Identifiers

PMID24475256
PMCPMC3903639

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.