Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24475210›Full record

ArticlePloS one2014

Clinical comparison of 99mTc exametazime and 123I Ioflupane SPECT in patients with chronic mild traumatic brain injury.

Andrew B Newberg, Mijail Serruya, Andrew Gepty, Charles Intenzo, Todd Lewis, Daniel Amen, David S Russell, Nancy Wintering

Open access · goldAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Feasible Classified Models for Parkinson Disease fromSensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2019
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Andrew B NewbergMyrna Brind Center of Integrative Medicine, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States of America.
Mijail SerruyaDepartment of Neurology, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States of America.
Andrew GeptyMyrna Brind Center of Integrative Medicine, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States of America.
Charles IntenzoDepartment of Radiology, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States of America.
Todd LewisMagee Rehabilitation Hospital, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States of America.
Daniel AmenAmen Clinics, Inc., Newport Beach, California, United States of America.
David S RussellInstitute for Neurodegenerative Disorders, New Haven, Connecticut, United States of America ; Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, United States of America.
Nancy WinteringMyrna Brind Center of Integrative Medicine, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States of America.
Thomas Jefferson University · USAmen Clinics · USMagee Rehabilitation Hospital · USYale University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThis study evaluated the clinical interpretations of single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) using a cerebral blood flow and a dopamine transporter tracer in patients with chronic mild traumatic brain injury (TBI). The goal was to determine how these two different scan might be used and compared to each other in this patient population. METHODS AND

findingsTwenty-five patients with persistent symptoms after a mild TBI underwent SPECT with both (99m)Tc exametazime to measure cerebral blood flow (CBF) and (123)I ioflupane to measure dopamine transporter (DAT) binding. The scans were interpreted by two expert readers blinded to any case information and were assessed for abnormal findings in comparison to 10 controls for each type of scan. Qualitative CBF scores for each cortical and subcortical region along with DAT binding scores for the striatum were compared to each other across subjects and to controls. In addition, symptoms were compared to brain scan findings. TBI patients had an average of 6 brain regions with abnormal perfusion compared to controls who had an average of 2 abnormal regions (p<0.001). Patient with headaches had lower CBF in the right frontal lobe, and higher CBF in the left parietal lobe compared to patients without headaches. Lower CBF in the right temporal lobe correlated with poorer reported physical health. Higher DAT binding was associated with more depressive symptoms and overall poorer reported mental health. There was no clear association between CBF and DAT binding in these patients.

conclusionsOverall, both scans detected abnormalities in brain function, but appear to reflect different types of physiological processes associated with chronic mild TBI symptoms. Both types of scans might have distinct uses in the evaluation of chronic TBI patients depending on the clinical scenario.

Indexed as

NortropanesRadiopharmaceuticalsTechnetium Tc 99m ExametazimeAdolescentAdultAgedBrain InjuriesDopamine Plasma Membrane Transport ProteinsFemaleFrontal LobeHumansMaleMiddle AgedProtein BindingTemporal LobeTomography, Emission-Computed, Single-PhotonDopamine Plasma Membrane Transport ProteinsioflupaneNortropanesRadiopharmaceuticalsTechnetium Tc 99m Exametazime

Identifiers

PMID24475210
PMCPMC3901727
OpenAlexW2054522680

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.