Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24475164›Full record

ArticlePloS one2014

The uptake of soluble and particulate antigens by epithelial cells in the mouse small intestine.

Savannah E Howe, Duane J Lickteig, Kyle N Plunkett, Jan S Ryerse, Vjollca Konjufca

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 48 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
48citing papers in PubMed
6.3field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

48 citing papers in PubMed, 79 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Pharmacokinetics and tumor delivery of nanoparticles.Journal of drug delivery science and technology · 2023
    Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. A Novel Approach againstVaccines · 2021
    Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Infection and immunity · 2020
    Article
  19. Review
  20. Lipopolysaccharides transport during fat absorption in rodent small intestine.American journal of physiology. Gastrointestinal and liver physiology · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Savannah E HoweDepartment of Microbiology, Southern Illinois University, Carbondale, Illinois, United States of America.
Duane J LickteigDepartment of Microbiology, Southern Illinois University, Carbondale, Illinois, United States of America.
Kyle N PlunkettDepartment of Chemistry, Southern Illinois University, Carbondale, Illinois, United States of America.
Jan S RyerseDepartment of Pathology, Saint Louis University School of Medicine, Saint Louis, Missouri, United States of America.
Vjollca KonjufcaDepartment of Microbiology, Southern Illinois University, Carbondale, Illinois, United States of America.
Southern Illinois University Carbondale · USSaint Louis University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Intestinal epithelial cells (IECs) overlying the villi play a prominent role in absorption of digested nutrients and establish a barrier that separates the internal milieu from potentially harmful microbial antigens. Several mechanisms by which antigens of dietary and microbial origin enter the body have been identified; however whether IECs play a role in antigen uptake is not known. Using in vivo imaging of the mouse small intestine, we investigated whether epithelial cells (enterocytes) play an active role in the uptake (sampling) of lumen antigens. We found that small molecular weight antigens such as chicken ovalbumin, dextran, and bacterial LPS enter the lamina propria, the loose connective tissue which lies beneath the epithelium via goblet cell associated passageways. However, epithelial cells overlying the villi can internalize particulate antigens such as bacterial cell debris and inert nanoparticles (NPs), which are then found co-localizing with the CD11c+ dendritic cells in the lamina propria. The extent of NP uptake by IECs depends on their size: 20-40 nm NPs are taken up readily, while NPs larger than 100 nm are taken up mainly by the epithelial cells overlying Peyer's patches. Blocking NPs with small proteins or conjugating them with ovalbumin does not inhibit their uptake. However, the uptake of 40 nm NPs can be inhibited when they are administered with an endocytosis inhibitor (chlorpromazine). Delineating the mechanisms of antigen uptake in the gut is essential for understanding how tolerance and immunity to lumen antigens are generated, and for the development of mucosal vaccines and therapies.

Indexed as

AbsorptionAnimalsAntigensBlotting, WesternDextransEnterocytesIntestine, SmallLipopolysaccharidesMiceMice, Inbred C57BLMicroscopy, ConfocalMicroscopy, FluorescenceOvalbuminParticle SizeAntigensDextransLipopolysaccharidesOvalbumin

Identifiers

PMID24475164
PMCPMC3903549
OpenAlexW2007360528

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.