ArticlePloS one2014
Two distinct dynamic modes subtend the detection of unexpected sounds.
Article in PloS one, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 45 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
45 citing papers in PubMed.
- Decoding object categories from electroencephalography during free viewing reveals early information evolution compared to passive viewing.Journal of vision · 2026Article
- Dose-dependent power and connectivity modulation of low frequency oscillations through transcranial magnetic stimulation in non-human primates.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- Behavioral, experiential, and physiological signatures of mind blanking.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025Article
- Attention-Dependent but not Pre-attentive Neural Markers of Auditory Change Process are Atypical in Adults With Autism Spectrum Conditions.Journal of autism and developmental disorders · 2025Article
- The detection of algebraic auditory structures emerges with self-supervised learning.PLoS computational biology · 2025Article
- Decoding Analyses Show Dynamic Waxing and Waning of Event-Related Potentials in Coma Patients.Brain sciences · 2025Article
- What does my network learn? Assessing interpretability of deep learning for EEG.Imaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.) · 2025Article
- Supramodal and modality-specific neural information supports multi-feature prediction errors across cortical levels.Imaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.) · 2025Article
- Right posterior theta reflects human parahippocampal phase resetting by salient cues during goal-directed navigation.Imaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.) · 2025Article
- Assessing the influence of latency variability on EEG classifiers - a case study of face repetition priming.Cognitive neurodynamics · 2024Article
- Decoding the Temporal Structures and Interactions of Multiple Face Dimensions Using Optically Pumped Magnetometer Magnetoencephalography (OPM-MEG).The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2024Article
- Shared neural codes of recognition memory.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Isolating Neural Signatures of Conscious Speech Perception with a No-Report Sine-Wave Speech Paradigm.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2024Article
- Semantic composition in experimental and naturalistic paradigms.Imaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.) · 2024Article
- A multimodal cortical network of sensory expectation violation revealed by fMRI.Human brain mapping · 2023Article
- Pre-movement event-related potentials and multivariate pattern of EEG encode action outcome prediction.Human brain mapping · 2023Article
- Decoding numeracy and literacy in the human brain: insights from MEG and MVPA.Scientific reports · 2023Article
- Expectation violations enhance neuronal encoding of sensory information in mouse primary visual cortex.Nature communications · 2023Article
- Towards causal mechanisms of consciousness through focused transcranial brain stimulation.Neuroscience of consciousness · 2023Review
- Sensory Target Detection at Local and Global Timescales Reveals a Hierarchy of Supramodal Dynamics in the Human Cortex.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The brain response to auditory novelty comprises two main eeg components: an early mismatch negativity and a late P300. Whereas the former has been proposed to reflect a prediction error, the latter is often associated with working memory updating. Interestingly, these two proposals predict fundamentally different dynamics: prediction errors are thought to propagate serially through several distinct brain areas, while working memory supposes that activity is sustained over time within a stable set of brain areas. Here we test this temporal dissociation by showing how the generalization of brain activity patterns across time can characterize the dynamics of the underlying neural processes. This method is applied to magnetoencephalography (MEG) recordings acquired from healthy participants who were presented with two types of auditory novelty. Following our predictions, the results show that the mismatch evoked by a local novelty leads to the sequential recruitment of distinct and short-lived patterns of brain activity. In sharp contrast, the global novelty evoked by an unexpected sequence of five sounds elicits a sustained state of brain activity that lasts for several hundreds of milliseconds. The present results highlight how MEG combined with multivariate pattern analyses can characterize the dynamics of human cortical processes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.