ReviewInternational journal of women's health2014
Prescribing menopausal hormone therapy: an evidence-based approach.
Review in International journal of women's health, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
29 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 103 citations in OpenAlex.
- Progesterone vs. synthetic progestins and the risk of breast cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Systematic reviews · 2016Pooled it
- Aortic hemodynamics in postmenopausal women following cessation of hormone therapy.Physiological reports · 2017Trial
- Pharmacological Management of ADHD in Women Across Perimenopause, Menopause and Post-Menopause.Drugs & aging · 2026Review
- Feasibility of identifying factors related to Alzheimer's disease and related dementia in real-world data.JAMIA open · 2026Review
- Effects of Menopausal Hormone Therapy on Uterine Fibroids in Women During Menopausal Transition.International journal of women's health · 2026Article
- Review of hormonal replacement therapy options for the treatments of menopausal symptoms.Korean journal of family medicine · 2025Article
- Article
- Attitude, Practices, and Barriers to Menopausal Hormone Therapy Among Physicians in Saudi Arabia.Cureus · 2024Article
- Effects of daily probiotic supplementation withFrontiers in nutrition · 2024Article
- Menopausal hormone therapy and central nervous system tumors: Danish nested case-control study.PLoS medicine · 2023Observational
- Age-Related Hormones Changes and Its Impact on Health Status and Lifespan.Aging and disease · 2023Review
- Supraphysiologic Vaginal Estrogen Therapy in Aged Mice Mitigates Age-Associated Bladder Inflammatory Response to Urinary Tract Infections.Urogynecology (Philadelphia, Pa.) · 2023Article
- Aromatase Inhibition Eliminates Sexual Receptivity Without Enhancing Weight Gain in Ovariectomized Marmoset Monkeys.Journal of the Endocrine Society · 2022Article
- Impact of Screening on Breast Cancer Incidence in Kazakhstan: Results of Component Analysis.Asian Pacific journal of cancer prevention : APJCP · 2021Article
- Interactions of the microbiome with pharmacological and non-pharmacological approaches for the management of ageing-related musculoskeletal diseases.Therapeutic advances in musculoskeletal disease · 2021Review
- Effects of ERβ and ERα on OVX-induced changes in adiposity and insulin resistance.The Journal of endocrinology · 2020Article
- Progestogens as a component of menopausal hormone therapy: the right molecule makes the difference.Drugs in context · 2020Review
- Encapsulation of ovarian allograft precludes immune rejection and promotes restoration of endocrine function in immune-competent ovariectomized mice.Scientific reports · 2019Article
- Fatty Acid Profile of Postmenopausal Women Receiving, and Not Receiving, Hormone Replacement Therapy.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2019Article
- Cardiovascular health and the menopausal woman: the role of estrogen and when to begin and end hormone treatment.F1000Research · 2019Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The constantly changing landscape regarding menopausal hormone therapy (MHT) has been challenging for providers caring for menopausal women. After a decade of fear and uncertainty regarding MHT, reanalysis of the Women's Health Initiative data and the results of recent studies have provided some clarity regarding the balance of risks and benefits of systemic MHT. Age and years since menopause are now known to be important variables affecting the benefit-risk profile. For symptomatic menopausal women who are under 60 years of age or within 10 years of menopause, the benefits of MHT generally outweigh the risks. Systemic MHT initiated early in menopause appears to slow the progression of atherosclerotic disease, thereby reducing the risk of cardiovascular disease and mortality. During this window of opportunity, MHT might also provide protection against cognitive decline. In older women and women more than 10 years past menopause, the risk-benefit balance of MHT is less favorable, particularly with regard to cardiovascular risk and cognitive impairment. For women entering menopause prematurely (<40 years), MHT ameliorates the risk of cardiovascular disease, osteoporosis, and cognitive decline. Nonoral administration of estrogen offers advantages due to the lack of first-pass hepatic metabolism, which in turn avoids the increased hepatic synthesis of clotting proteins, C-reactive protein, triglycerides, and sex hormone-binding globulin. The duration of combined MHT use is ideally limited to less than 5 years because of the known increase in breast cancer risk after 3-5 years of use. Limitations to use of estrogen only MHT are less clear, since breast cancer risk does not appear to increase with use of estrogen alone. For women under the age of 60 years, or within 10 years of onset of natural menopause, MHT for the treatment of bothersome menopausal symptoms poses low risk and is an acceptable option, particularly when nonhormonal management approaches fail.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.