Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24474794›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2014

Discrete mechanisms of mTOR and cell cycle regulation by AMPK agonists independent of AMPK.

Xiaona Liu, Rishi Raj Chhipa, Shabnam Pooya, Matthew Wortman, Sara Yachyshin, Lionel M L Chow, Ashish Kumar, Xuan Zhou, Ying Sun, Brian Quinn and 9 more

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 135 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
135citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
15.1field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

135 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 221 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Research Progress on the Use of Metformin in Leukemia Treatment.Current treatment options in oncology · 2024
    Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Metabolic Reprogramming and Potential Therapeutic Targets in Lymphoma.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article

75 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

19 authors at 8 institutions in 3 countries.

Xiaona LiuDepartments of Oncology, Experimental Hematology and Cancer Biology, and Human Genetics, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, OH 45242.
Rishi Raj Chhipa
Shabnam Pooya
Matthew Wortman
Sara Yachyshin
Lionel M L Chow
Ashish Kumar
Xuan Zhou
Ying Sun
Brian Quinn
Christopher McPherson
Ronald E Warnick
Ady Kendler
Shailendra Giri
Jeroen Poels
Koenraad Norga
Benoit Viollet
Gregory A Grabowski
Biplab Dasgupta
Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center · USLaboratoire d’immunologie intégrative du cancer · FRUniversity of Cincinnati · USAntwerp University Hospital · BECentre National de la Recherche Scientifique · FRKU Leuven · BEMayfield Brain & Spine · USWinnMed · US

Funding

Cincinnati Center for Excellence in Molecular HematologyP30DK090971 · NIDDK · CINCINNATI CHILDRENS HOSP MED CTR · PI ZHENG, YI · 2010 to 2015
$4.0M
Regulation of Forebrain Neurogenesis by the Energy Sensor AMP KinaseR01NS075291 · NINDS · CINCINNATI CHILDRENS HOSP MED CTR · PI DASGUPTA, BIPLAB · 2012 to 2016
$1.7M
NIDDK NIH HHS P30 DK090971NINDS NIH HHS 1R01NS075291-01A1NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS075291
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The multifunctional AMPK-activated protein kinase (AMPK) is an evolutionarily conserved energy sensor that plays an important role in cell proliferation, growth, and survival. It remains unclear whether AMPK functions as a tumor suppressor or a contextual oncogene. This is because although on one hand active AMPK inhibits mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) and lipogenesis--two crucial arms of cancer growth--AMPK also ensures viability by metabolic reprogramming in cancer cells. AMPK activation by two indirect AMPK agonists AICAR and metformin (now in over 50 clinical trials on cancer) has been correlated with reduced cancer cell proliferation and viability. Surprisingly, we found that compared with normal tissue, AMPK is constitutively activated in both human and mouse gliomas. Therefore, we questioned whether the antiproliferative actions of AICAR and metformin are AMPK independent. Both AMPK agonists inhibited proliferation, but through unique AMPK-independent mechanisms and both reduced tumor growth in vivo independent of AMPK. Importantly, A769662, a direct AMPK activator, had no effect on proliferation, uncoupling high AMPK activity from inhibition of proliferation. Metformin directly inhibited mTOR by enhancing PRAS40's association with RAPTOR, whereas AICAR blocked the cell cycle through proteasomal degradation of the G2M phosphatase cdc25c. Together, our results suggest that although AICAR and metformin are potent AMPK-independent antiproliferative agents, physiological AMPK activation in glioma may be a response mechanism to metabolic stress and anticancer agents.

Indexed as

AMP-Activated Protein Kinase KinasesAnimalsBrain NeoplasmsCell CycleCell ProliferationCells, CulturedGlioblastomaHumansLipogenesisMetforminMiceMice, KnockoutProtein KinasesTOR Serine-Threonine KinasesAMP-Activated Protein Kinase KinasesMetforminmTOR protein, mouseProtein KinasesTOR Serine-Threonine Kinasesgliomametabolism

Identifiers

PMID24474794
PMCPMC3910576
OpenAlexW2065804460

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.