Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24474770›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2014

Primate energy expenditure and life history.

Herman Pontzer, David A Raichlen, Adam D Gordon, Kara K Schroepfer-Walker, Brian Hare, Matthew C O'Neill, Kathleen M Muldoon, Holly M Dunsworth, Brian M Wood, Karin Isler and 5 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 47 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
47citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
16.7field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

47 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 163 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Energy constraint on human health.Trends in endocrinology and metabolism: TEM · 2026
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. The "fire of life cycles": age-specific metabolic scaling within and among species.Journal of comparative physiology. B, Biochemical, systemic, and environmental physiology · 2026
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Metabolic scaling, energy allocation tradeoffs, and the evolution of humans' unique metabolism.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Towards an integrated understanding of dietary phenotypes.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2023
    Review
  15. Article
  16. The provisioned primate: patterns of obesity across lemurs, monkeys, apes and humans.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2023
    Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Energy budgets of captive Chinese pangolins (Conservation physiology · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 12 institutions in 2 countries.

Herman PontzerDepartment of Anthropology, Hunter College, New York, NY 10065.
David A Raichlen
Adam D Gordon
Kara K Schroepfer-Walker
Brian Hare
Matthew C O'Neill
Kathleen M Muldoon
Holly M Dunsworth
Brian M Wood
Karin Isler
Judith Burkart
Mitchell Irwin
Robert W Shumaker
Elizabeth V Lonsdorf
Stephen R Ross
Duke University · USLincoln Park Zoo · USUniversity of Zurich · CHAlbany State University · USDartmouth College · USIndianapolis Zoo · USNew York Consortium in Evolutionary Primatology · USNorthern Illinois University · USStony Brook University · USUniversity of Arizona · USUniversity of Rhode Island · USYale University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Humans and other primates are distinct among placental mammals in having exceptionally slow rates of growth, reproduction, and aging. Primates' slow life history schedules are generally thought to reflect an evolved strategy of allocating energy away from growth and reproduction and toward somatic investment, particularly to the development and maintenance of large brains. Here we examine an alternative explanation: that primates' slow life histories reflect low total energy expenditure (TEE) (kilocalories per day) relative to other placental mammals. We compared doubly labeled water measurements of TEE among 17 primate species with similar measures for other placental mammals. We found that primates use remarkably little energy each day, expending on average only 50% of the energy expected for a placental mammal of similar mass. Such large differences in TEE are not easily explained by differences in physical activity, and instead appear to reflect systemic metabolic adaptation for low energy expenditures in primates. Indeed, comparisons of wild and captive primate populations indicate similar levels of energy expenditure. Broad interspecific comparisons of growth, reproduction, and maximum life span indicate that primates' slow metabolic rates contribute to their characteristically slow life histories.

Indexed as

Energy MetabolismLife Cycle StagesAnimalsBasal MetabolismHumansPrimatesecologyevolutionmetabolism

Identifiers

PMID24474770
PMCPMC3910615
OpenAlexW2101391314

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.