Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24474691›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of biological chemistry2014

Identification and characterization of an oocyte factor required for porcine nuclear reprogramming.

Qingran Kong, Bingteng Xie, Jingyu Li, Yanjun Huan, Tianqing Huang, Renyue Wei, Jiawei Lv, Shichao Liu, Zhonghua Liu

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of biological chemistry, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
4.5field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Qingran KongLaboratory of Embryo Biotechnology, College of Life Science, Northeast Agricultural University, Harbin 150030, China.
Bingteng XieLaboratory of Embryo Biotechnology, College of Life Science, Northeast Agricultural University, Harbin 150030, China.
Jingyu LiLaboratory of Embryo Biotechnology, College of Life Science, Northeast Agricultural University, Harbin 150030, China.
Yanjun HuanLaboratory of Embryo Biotechnology, College of Life Science, Northeast Agricultural University, Harbin 150030, China.
Tianqing HuangLaboratory of Embryo Biotechnology, College of Life Science, Northeast Agricultural University, Harbin 150030, China.
Renyue WeiLaboratory of Embryo Biotechnology, College of Life Science, Northeast Agricultural University, Harbin 150030, China.
Jiawei LvLaboratory of Embryo Biotechnology, College of Life Science, Northeast Agricultural University, Harbin 150030, China.
Shichao LiuLaboratory of Embryo Biotechnology, College of Life Science, Northeast Agricultural University, Harbin 150030, China.
Zhonghua LiuLaboratory of Embryo Biotechnology, College of Life Science, Northeast Agricultural University, Harbin 150030, China. Electronic address: liu086@yahoo.com.
Northeast Agricultural University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Nuclear reprogramming of somatic cells can be induced by oocyte factors. Despite numerous attempts, the factors responsible for successful nuclear reprogramming remain elusive. In the present study, we found that porcine oocytes with the first polar body collected at 42 h of in vitro maturation had a stronger ability to support early development of cloned embryos than porcine oocytes with the first polar body collected at 33 h of in vitro maturation. To explore the key reprogramming factors responsible for the difference, we compared proteome signatures of the two groups of oocytes. 18 differentially expressed proteins between these two groups of oocytes were discovered by mass spectrometry (MS). Among these proteins, we especially focused on vimentin (VIM). A certain amount of VIM protein was stored in oocytes and accumulated during oocyte maturation, and maternal VIM was specifically incorporated into transferred somatic nuclei during nuclear reprogramming. When maternal VIM function was inhibited by anti-VIM antibody, the rate of cloned embryos developing to blastocysts was significantly lower than that of IgG antibody-injected embryos and non-injected embryos (12.24 versus 22.57 and 21.10%; p < 0.05), but the development of in vitro fertilization and parthenogenetic activation embryos was not affected. Furthermore, we found that DNA double strand breaks dramatically increased and that the p53 pathway was activated in cloned embryos when VIM function was inhibited. This study demonstrates that maternal VIM, as a genomic protector, is crucial for nuclear reprogramming in porcine cloned embryos.

Indexed as

Cellular ReprogrammingCloning, OrganismAnimalsBlastocystEmbryonic DevelopmentFemaleNuclear Transfer TechniquesOocytesPolar BodiesSwineVimentinVimentinChromatin RemodelingCloningDNA DamageOocytePigReprogrammingVimentin

Identifiers

PMID24474691
PMCPMC3945357
OpenAlexW2035682070

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.