Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24473505›Full record

ArticleClinics (Sao Paulo, Brazil)2013

pH in exhaled breath condensate and nasal lavage as a biomarker of air pollution-related inflammation in street traffic-controllers and office-workers.

Thamires Marques de Lima, Cristiane Mayumi Kazama, Andreas Rembert Koczulla, Pieter S Hiemstra, Mariangela Macchione, Ana Luisa Godoy Fernandes, Ubiratan de Paula Santos, Maria Lucia Bueno-Garcia, Dirce Maria Zanetta, Carmen Diva Saldiva de André and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Clinics (Sao Paulo, Brazil), 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Inflammatory Biomarkers in Exhaled Breath Condensate: A Systematic Review.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Observational
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Thamires Marques de LimaDepartment of Pathology, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de São Paulo, São PauloSP, Brazil.
Cristiane Mayumi KazamaDepartment of Pathology, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de São Paulo, São PauloSP, Brazil.
Andreas Rembert KoczullaDepartment of Pulmonology, Philipps University, Marburg, Germany.
Pieter S HiemstraDepartment of Pulmonology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Mariangela MacchioneDepartment of Pathology, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de São Paulo, São PauloSP, Brazil.
Ana Luisa Godoy FernandesDepartment of Pneumology, School of Medicine, Universidade Federal de São Paulo, São PauloSP, Brazil.
Ubiratan de Paula SantosPneumology Division, Instituto do Coração, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de São Paulo, São PauloSP, Brazil.
Maria Lucia Bueno-GarciaDepartment of Internal Medicine, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de São Paulo, São PauloSP, Brazil.
Dirce Maria ZanettaDepartment of Epidemiology, Public Health Faculty, Universidade de São Paulo, São PauloSP, Brazil.
Carmen Diva Saldiva de AndréInstitute of Mathematics and Statistics, Universidade de São Paulo, São PauloSP, Brazil.
Paulo Hilario Nascimento SaldivaDepartment of Pathology, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de São Paulo, São PauloSP, Brazil.
Naomi Kondo NakagawaDepartment of Pathology, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de São Paulo, São PauloSP, Brazil.
Leiden University Medical Center · NLPhilipps University of Marburg · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo utilize low-cost and simple methods to assess airway and lung inflammation biomarkers related to air pollution.

methodsA total of 87 male, non-smoking, healthy subjects working as street traffic-controllers or office-workers were examined to determine carbon monoxide in exhaled breath and to measure the pH in nasal lavage fluid and exhaled breath condensate. Air pollution exposure was measured by particulate matter concentration, and data were obtained from fixed monitoring stations (8-h work intervals per day, during the 5 consecutive days prior to the study).

resultsExhaled carbon monoxide was two-fold greater in traffic-controllers than in office-workers. The mean pH values were 8.12 in exhaled breath condensate and 7.99 in nasal lavage fluid in office-workers; these values were lower in traffic-controllers (7.80 and 7.30, respectively). Both groups presented similar cytokines concentrations in both substrates, however, IL-1β and IL-8 were elevated in nasal lavage fluid compared with exhaled breath condensate. The particulate matter concentration was greater at the workplace of traffic-controllers compared with that of office-workers.

conclusionThe pH values of nasal lavage fluid and exhaled breath condensate are important, robust, easy to measure and reproducible biomarkers that can be used to monitor occupational exposure to air pollution. Additionally, traffic-controllers are at an increased risk of airway and lung inflammation during their occupational activities compared with office-workers.

Indexed as

ExhalationAdolescentAdultAir PollutionBiomarkersBreath TestsCarbon MonoxideCross-Sectional StudiesCytokinesHumansHydrogen-Ion ConcentrationMaleMiddle AgedNasal LavageOccupational ExposureParticulate MatterBiomarkersCarbon MonoxideCytokinesParticulate Matter

Identifiers

PMID24473505
PMCPMC3840367
OpenAlexW2063136235

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.