Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24473266›Full record

ReviewNature neuroscience2014

Normal and abnormal coding of somatosensory stimuli causing pain.

Steven A Prescott, Qiufu Ma, Yves De Koninck

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Nature neuroscience, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 97 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
97citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

97 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. An Innervated Human Skin Equivalent that Electrically Encodes Mechanical and Thermal Stimuli.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Spinal Processing of Spatiotemporally Diverse Tactile Stimuli: Computational Insights into Allodynia and Spinal Cord Stimulation.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2026
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Survey of temporal coding of sensory information.Frontiers in computational neuroscience · 2025
    Article
  17. Review
  18. Encoding of Vibrotactile Stimuli by Mechanoreceptors in Rodent Glabrous Skin.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2024
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

37 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Steven A Prescott1] Neurosciences and Mental Health, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ontario, Canada. [2] Department of Physiology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Qiufu Ma1] Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts, USA. [2] Department of Neurobiology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Yves De Koninck1] Institut universitaire en santé mentale de Québec, Université Laval, Québec, Québec, Canada. [2] Department of Psychiatry and Neuroscience, Université Laval, Québec, Québec, Canada.ORCID 0000000257799330

Funding

TRP Channel Mediated Pain CircuitryP01NS072040 · NINDS · BOSTON CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL · PI WOOLF, CLIFFORD J · 2011 to 2015
$6.7M
Genetic Control of Nociceptive Sensory Neuron Development and Pain BehaviorR01DE018025 · NIDCR · DANA-FARBER CANCER INST · PI MA, QIUFU · 2007 to 2016
$4.0M
Intersectional genetic dissection of spinal circuits processing pain and itchR01NS086372 · NINDS · SALK INSTITUTE FOR BIOLOGICAL STUDIES · PI GOULDING, MARTYN D, MA, QIUFU · 2013 to 2017
$3.5M
Regulation of Glutamate and Gamma Aminobutyrate neuron developmentR01NS047710 · NINDS · DANA-FARBER CANCER INSTITUTE · PI MA, QIUFU · 2004 to 2013
$3.4M
Biophysical mechanisms regulating synchrony transfer in somatosensory cortexR01NS076706 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI PRESCOTT, STEVEN A. · 2011 to 2014
$785k
Computational investigation of neuropathic changes in primary afferent excitabiliR21NS074146 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI PRESCOTT, STEVEN A. · 2011 to 2012
$287k
CIHR MOP 12942NIDCR NIH HHS R01 DE018025NINDS NIH HHS P01 NS0272040NINDS NIH HHS P01 NS072040NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS047710NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS076706NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS086372NINDS NIH HHS R21 NS074146
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Noxious stimuli usually cause pain and pain usually arises from noxious stimuli, but exceptions to these apparent truisms are the basis for clinically important problems and provide valuable insight into the neural code for pain. In this Review, we discuss how painful sensations arise. We argue that, although primary somatosensory afferents are tuned to specific stimulus features, natural stimuli often activate more than one type of afferent. Manipulating coactivation patterns can alter perception in ways that argue against each type of afferent acting independently (as expected for strictly labeled lines), suggesting instead that signals conveyed by different types of afferents interact. Deciphering the central circuits that mediate those interactions is critical for explaining the generation and modulation of neural signals that ultimately elicit pain. The advent of genetic and optical dissection techniques promise to dramatically accelerate progress toward this goal, which will facilitate the rational design of future pain therapeutics.

Indexed as

Afferent PathwaysAnimalsHumansModels, BiologicalNociceptorsPainPerceptionPhysical Stimulation

Identifiers

PMID24473266
PMCPMC4079041

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.