Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24473109›Full record

SynthesisInternational journal of environmental research and public health2014

Diesel exhaust exposure and the risk of lung cancer--a review of the epidemiological evidence.

Yi Sun, Frank Bochmann, Annette Nold, Markus Mattenklott

Open access · goldAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 31 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. A Comparison of the Health Effects of Ambient Particulate Matter Air Pollution from Five Emission Sources.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2018
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Diesel engine exhaust and lung cancer risks - evaluation of the meta-analysis by Vermeulen et al. 2014.Journal of occupational medicine and toxicology (London, England) · 2015
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Yi SunInstitute for Occupational Safety and Health of the German Social Accident Insurance (IFA), Alter Heerstraße 111, Sankt Augustin 53773, Germany. yi.sun@dguv.de.
Frank BochmannInstitute for Occupational Safety and Health of the German Social Accident Insurance (IFA), Alter Heerstraße 111, Sankt Augustin 53773, Germany. frank.bochmann@dguv.de.
Annette NoldInstitute for Occupational Safety and Health of the German Social Accident Insurance (IFA), Alter Heerstraße 111, Sankt Augustin 53773, Germany. annette.nold@dguv.de.
Markus MattenklottInstitute for Occupational Safety and Health of the German Social Accident Insurance (IFA), Alter Heerstraße 111, Sankt Augustin 53773, Germany. markus.mattenklott@dguv.de.
Institut für Arbeitsschutz der Deutschen Gesetzlichen Unfallversicherung · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To critically evaluate the association between diesel exhaust (DE) exposure and the risk of lung cancer, we conducted a systematic review of published epidemiological evidences. To comprehensively identify original studies on the association between DE exposure and the risk of lung cancer, literature searches were performed in literature databases for the period between 1970 and 2013, including bibliographies and cross-referencing. In total, 42 cohort studies and 32 case-control studies were identified in which the association between DE exposures and lung cancer was examined. In general, previous studies suffer from a series of methodological limitations, including design, exposure assessment methods and statistical analysis used. A lack of objective exposure information appears to be the main problem in interpreting epidemiological evidence. To facilitate the interpretation and comparison of previous studies, a job-exposure matrix (JEM) of DE exposures was created based on around 4,000 historical industrial measurements. The values from the JEM were considered during interpretation and comparison of previous studies. Overall, neither cohort nor case-control studies indicate a clear exposure-response relationship between DE exposure and lung cancer. Epidemiological studies published to date do not allow a valid quantification of the association between DE and lung cancer.

Indexed as

Case-Control StudiesCohort StudiesHumansLung NeoplasmsRisk AssessmentVehicle EmissionsVehicle Emissions

Identifiers

PMID24473109
PMCPMC3945540
OpenAlexW2136396002

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.