Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24472892›Full record

ArticleJournal of visualized experiments : JoVE2014

Viability assays for cells in culture.

Jessica M Posimo, Ajay S Unnithan, Amanda M Gleixner, Hailey J Choi, Yiran Jiang, Sree H Pulugulla, Rehana K Leak

Open access · bronzeAbstract readVideo-Audio Media
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of visualized experiments : JoVE, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed, 38 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Injectable Piezoelectric Hydrogel for Vital Pulp Therapy.Journal of functional biomaterials · 2025
    Article
  3. Anti-obesity peptides from food: Production, evaluation, sources, and commercialization.Comprehensive reviews in food science and food safety · 2025
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Antiviral Activity ofAntimicrobial agents and chemotherapy · 2023
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Targeting malaria parasites with novel derivatives of azithromycin.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2022
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Microvesicles transfer mitochondria and increase mitochondrial function in brain endothelial cells.Journal of controlled release : official journal of the Controlled Release Society · 2021
    Article
  13. Physiological and Pathological Factors Affecting Drug Delivery to the Brain by Nanoparticles.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2021
    Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Jessica M PosimoDivision of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Mylan School of Pharmacy, Duquesne University.
Ajay S Unnithan
Amanda M Gleixner
Hailey J Choi
Yiran Jiang
Sree H Pulugulla
Rehana K Leak
Duquesne University · USMylan (Italy) · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Manual cell counts on a microscope are a sensitive means of assessing cellular viability but are time-consuming and therefore expensive. Computerized viability assays are expensive in terms of equipment but can be faster and more objective than manual cell counts. The present report describes the use of three such viability assays. Two of these assays are infrared and one is luminescent. Both infrared assays rely on a 16 bit Odyssey Imager. One infrared assay uses the DRAQ5 stain for nuclei combined with the Sapphire stain for cytosol and is visualized in the 700 nm channel. The other infrared assay, an In-Cell Western, uses antibodies against cytoskeletal proteins (α-tubulin or microtubule associated protein 2) and labels them in the 800 nm channel. The third viability assay is a commonly used luminescent assay for ATP, but we use a quarter of the recommended volume to save on cost. These measurements are all linear and correlate with the number of cells plated, but vary in sensitivity. All three assays circumvent time-consuming microscopy and sample the entire well, thereby reducing sampling error. Finally, all of the assays can easily be completed within one day of the end of the experiment, allowing greater numbers of experiments to be performed within short timeframes. However, they all rely on the assumption that cell numbers remain in proportion to signal strength after treatments, an assumption that is sometimes not met, especially for cellular ATP. Furthermore, if cells increase or decrease in size after treatment, this might affect signal strength without affecting cell number. We conclude that all viability assays, including manual counts, suffer from a number of caveats, but that computerized viability assays are well worth the initial investment. Using all three assays together yields a comprehensive view of cellular structure and function.

Indexed as

Adenosine TriphosphateAnimalsCell Line, TumorCell SurvivalCytological TechniquesLuminescent MeasurementsMiceNeuroblastomaSpectrophotometry, InfraredAdenosine Triphosphate

Identifiers

PMID24472892
PMCPMC4089439
OpenAlexW1979059719

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.