Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24472443›Full record

ArticlePerioperative medicine (London, England)2013

Less invasive methods of advanced hemodynamic monitoring: principles, devices, and their role in the perioperative hemodynamic optimization.

Christos Chamos, Liana Vele, Mark Hamilton, Maurizio Cecconi

3 registry-linked trialsOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Perioperative medicine (London, England), 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 3 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
5.5field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02275507 completednot on this mapstarted 2014, after this paper: background citation

Non-Invasive Hemoglobin Monitoring of Women Undergoing Cesarean Delivery

TypeobservationalSponsorStony Brook UniversityRan2014 to 2016Enrolled50ConditionsComplications of Pregnancy, Childbirth and the PuerperiumArmsMasimo Rainbow Sensor
NCT03893513 completednot on this mapstarted 2019, after this paper: background citation

Comparison of Transthoracic Electrical Bioimpedance and Pulse Contour Analysis in Renal Transplantation Patients: Analysis of Intraoperative Cardiac Output, Systemic Vascular Resistant and Stroke Volume Variation

TypeobservationalSponsorDita AditianingsihRan2019 to 2019Enrolled50ConditionsHemodynamic MonitoringArmsTransthoracic Electrical Bioimpedance, Pulse Contour Analysis
NCT04671537 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2018, after this paper: background citation

Effectiveness of Preloading Before Beach Chair Position on Patients Undergoing Arthroscopic Shoulder Surgery: Randomized Controlled Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorIstanbul UniversityRan2018 to 2020Enrolled49ConditionsShoulder Injuries, Anesthesia, Hemodynamic InstabilityArmsPreloading with crystalloid fluid
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 55 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Fluid management methods for severely burned patients: a narrative review.Journal of clinical monitoring and computing · 2026
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Non-invasive cardiac output monitoring device "ICON" in trauma patients: a feasibility study.European journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society · 2019
    Observational
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Observational
  16. Article
  17. Non-invasive hemodynamic monitoring in trauma patients.World journal of emergency surgery : WJES · 2015
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Christos ChamosSenior clinical fellow in cardiac anaesthesia, St George's Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK. hamos1977@yahoo.gr.
Liana Vele
Mark Hamilton
Maurizio Cecconi
South West London and St George's Mental Health NHS Trust · GBCroydon Health Services NHS Trust · GBSt George’s University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The monitoring of the cardiac output (CO) and other hemodynamic parameters, traditionally performed with the thermodilution method via a pulmonary artery catheter (PAC), is now increasingly done with the aid of less invasive and much easier to use devices. When used within the context of a hemodynamic optimization protocol, they can positively influence the outcome in both surgical and non-surgical patient populations. While these monitoring tools have simplified the hemodynamic calculations, they are subject to limitations and can lead to erroneous results if not used properly. In this article we will review the commercially available minimally invasive CO monitoring devices, explore their technical characteristics and describe the limitations that should be taken into consideration when clinical decisions are made.

Identifiers

PMID24472443
PMCPMC3964331
OpenAlexW2101006776

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.