Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24472394›Full record

SynthesisInternational wound journal2014

Systematic review of the use of prophylactic dressings in the prevention of pressure ulcers.

Michael Clark, Joyce Black, Paulo Alves, Ct Brindle, Evan Call, Carol Dealey, Nick Santamaria

Open access · bronzeAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in International wound journal, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
26.1field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 104 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Dressings and topical agents for preventing pressure ulcers.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2018
    Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Prophylactic dressings in the prevention of pressure ulcer related to the use of personal protective equipment by health professionals facing the COVID-19 pandemic: A randomized clinical trial.Wound repair and regeneration : official publication of the Wound Healing Society [and] the European Tissue Repair Society · 2021
    Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 7 institutions in 4 countries.

Michael ClarkWound Healing Practice Development Unit, Birmingham City University, Birmingham, UK.
Joyce Black
Paulo Alves
Ct Brindle
Evan Call
Carol Dealey
Nick Santamaria
Birmingham City University · GBNIHR Surgical Reconstruction and Microbiology Research Centre · GBThe Royal Melbourne Hospital · AUUniversidade Católica Portuguesa · PTUniversity of Nebraska Medical Center · USVirginia Commonwealth University Medical Center · USWeber State University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This systematic review considers the evidence supporting the use of prophylactic dressings for the prevention of pressure ulcer. Electronic database searches were conducted on 25 July 2013. The searches found 3026 titles and after removal of duplicate records 2819 titles were scanned against the inclusion and exclusion criteria. Of these, 2777 were excluded based on their title and abstract primarily because they discussed pressure ulcer healing, the prevention and treatment of other chronic and acute wounds or where the intervention was not a prophylactic dressing (e.g. underpads, heel protectors and cushions). Finally, the full text of 42 papers were retrieved. When these 42 papers were reviewed, 21 were excluded and 21 were included in the review. The single high-quality randomised controlled trial (RCT) and the growing number of cohort, weak RCT and case series all suggest that the introduction of a dressing as part of pressure ulcer prevention may help reduce pressure ulcer incidence associated with medical devices especially in immobile intensive care unit patients. There is no firm clinical evidence at this time to suggest that one dressing type is more effective than other dressings.

Indexed as

BandagesProtective DevicesWound HealingAdultAgedAged, 80 and overCritical CareFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPressure UlcerPressure ulcer preventionProphylactic dressings

Identifiers

PMID24472394
PMCPMC7950985
OpenAlexW2097145081

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.