ReviewDNA repair2014
Investigation of bacterial nucleotide excision repair using single-molecule techniques.
Review in DNA repair, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed.
- DNA polymerase I: structure, activity, and function in bacterial DNA replication and repair.Critical reviews in biochemistry and molecular biology · 2026Review
- Adapting to UV: Integrative Genomic and Structural Analysis in Bacteria from Chilean Extreme Environments.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Article
- Probing the mechanism of nick searching by LIG1 at the single-molecule level.Nucleic acids research · 2024Article
- Insight into Single-Molecule Imaging Techniques for the Study of Prokaryotic Genome Maintenance.Chemical & biomedical imaging · 2024Review
- Bacterial DNA excision repair pathways.Nature reviews. Microbiology · 2022Review
- Single molecule iSCAT imaging reveals a fast, energy efficient search mode for the DNA repair protein UvrA.Nanoscale · 2022Article
- Bacterial phenotypic heterogeneity in DNA repair and mutagenesis.Biochemical Society transactions · 2020Review
- Article
- Guidelines for DNA recombination and repair studies: Mechanistic assays of DNA repair processes.Microbial cell (Graz, Austria) · 2019Review
- Transcriptional profiling of Rickettsia prowazekii coding and non-coding transcripts during in vitro host-pathogen and vector-pathogen interactions.Ticks and tick-borne diseases · 2017Article
- A tale of two cities: A tribute to Aziz Sancar's Nobel Prize in Chemistry for his molecular characterization of NER.DNA repair · 2016Article
- Single molecule techniques in DNA repair: a primer.DNA repair · 2014Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Despite three decades of biochemical and structural analysis of the prokaryotic nucleotide excision repair (NER) system, many intriguing questions remain with regard to how the UvrA, UvrB, and UvrC proteins detect, verify and remove a wide range of DNA lesions. Single-molecule techniques have begun to allow more detailed understanding of the kinetics and action mechanism of this complex process. This article reviews how atomic force microscopy and fluorescence microscopy have captured new glimpses of how these proteins work together to mediate NER.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.