Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24472160›Full record

ArticlePerioperative medicine (London, England)2013

The maintenance and monitoring of perioperative blood volume.

Takehiko Iijima, Birgitte Brandstrup, Peter Rodhe, Audrius Andrijauskas, Christer H Svensen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Perioperative medicine (London, England), 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Observational
  6. Fluid Therapy in Thoracic Surgery: A Zero-Balance Target is Always Best!Turkish journal of anaesthesiology and reanimation · 2016
    Article
  7. Observational
  8. Article
  9. Perioperative blood management.Indian journal of anaesthesia · 2014
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Takehiko Iijima
Birgitte Brandstrup
Peter Rodhe
Audrius Andrijauskas
Christer H SvensenKarolinska Institutet, Department of Clinical Science and Education, Section of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, Södersjukhuset, Stockholm, Sweden. christer.svensen@sodersjukhuset.se.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The assessment and maintenance of perioperative blood volume is important because fluid therapy is a routine part of intraoperative care. In the past, patients undergoing major surgery were given large amounts of fluids because health-care providers were concerned about preoperative dehydration and intraoperative losses to a third space. In the last decade it has become clear that fluid therapy has to be more individualized. Because the exact determination of blood volume is not clinically possible at every timepoint, there have been different approaches to assess fluid requirements, such as goal-directed protocols guided by invasive and less invasive devices.This article focuses on laboratory volume determination, capillary dynamics, aspects of different fluids and how to clinically assess and monitor perioperative blood volume.

Identifiers

PMID24472160
PMCPMC3964327

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.