ArticleBritish journal of pharmacology2014
A physiologically based pharmacokinetic model of alvespimycin in mice and extrapolation to rats and humans.
Article in British journal of pharmacology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Utility of physiologically based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) modeling in oncology drug development and its accuracy: a systematic review.European journal of clinical pharmacology · 2018Pooled it
- Trial
- Leveraging quantum chemical properties in transfer learning for predicting blood-brain barrier permeability of drugs.Drug delivery and translational research · 2026Article
- Mechanistic data-informed multiscale quantitative systems pharmacology modeling framework enables the clinical translation and efficacy assessment of CAR-T therapy in solid tumors.Journal for immunotherapy of cancer · 2025Article
- High-resolution fecal pharmacokinetic modeling in mice with orally administered antibiotics.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- A whole-body mechanistic physiologically-based pharmacokinetic modeling of intravenous iron.Drug delivery and translational research · 2025Article
- Evaluation of Luteolin Nanosuspensions on Pharmacokinetics of Atorvastatin: Drug-Drug Interactions Using Rat Models.International journal of nanomedicine · 2025Article
- Evolutionary Analysis and Antiviral Drug Prediction of Mpox Virus.Microorganisms · 2024Article
- Using the LeiCNS-PK3.0 Physiologically-Based Pharmacokinetic Model to Predict Brain Extracellular Fluid Pharmacokinetics in Mice.Pharmaceutical research · 2023Article
- A quantitative high-throughput screen identifies compounds that lower expression of the SCA2-and ALS-associated gene ATXN2.The Journal of biological chemistry · 2022Article
- Impact of CNS Diseases on Drug Delivery to Brain Extracellular and Intracellular Target Sites in Human: A "WHAT-IF" Simulation Study.Pharmaceutics · 2021Article
- Physiologically based pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic modeling for prediction of vonoprazan pharmacokinetics and its inhibition on gastric acid secretion following intravenous/oral administration to rats, dogs and humans.Acta pharmacologica Sinica · 2020Article
- Drug Exposure to Establish Pharmacokinetic-Response Relationships in Oncology.Clinical pharmacokinetics · 2020Review
- A Physiologically Based Pharmacokinetic Model of Amiodarone and its Metabolite Desethylamiodarone in Rats: Pooled Analysis of Published Data.European journal of drug metabolism and pharmacokinetics · 2016Article
- Prediction of Deoxypodophyllotoxin Disposition in Mouse, Rat, Monkey, and Dog by Physiologically Based Pharmacokinetic Model and the Extrapolation to Human.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2016Article
- Physiologically Based Pharmacokinetic Modeling of Fluorescently Labeled Block Copolymer Nanoparticles for Controlled Drug Delivery in Leukemia Therapy.CPT: pharmacometrics & systems pharmacology · 2015Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
background and purposeAlvespimycin, a new generation of heat shock protein 90 (Hsp90) inhibitor in clinical trial, is a promising therapeutic agent for cancer. Pharmacokinetic models of alvespimycin would help in the understanding of drug disposition, predicting drug exposure and interpreting dose-response relationship. In the present study we aimed to develop a physiologically based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) model of alvespimycin in mice and evaluate the utility of the model for predicting alvespimycin disposition in other species. EXPERIMENTAL APPROACH: A literature search was performed to collect pharmacokinetic data for alvespimycin. A PBPK model was initially constructed to demonstrate the disposition of alvespimycin in mice, and then extrapolated to rats and humans by taking into account the interspecies differences in physiological- and chemical-specific parameters. KEY
resultsA PBPK model, employing a permeability-limited model structure and saturable tissue binding, was built in mice. It successfully characterized the time course of the disposition of alvespimycin in mice. After extrapolation to rats, the model simulated the alvespimycin concentration-time profiles in rat tissues with acceptable accuracies. Likewise, a reasonable match was found between the observed and simulated human plasma pharmacokinetics of alvespimycin. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS: The PBPK model described here is beneficial to the understanding and prediction of the effects of alvespimycin in different species. It also provides a good basis for further development, which necessitates additional studies, especially those needed to clarify the in-depth mechanism of alvespimycin elimination. A refined PBPK model would benefit the understanding of dose-response relationships and optimization of dosing regimens.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.