Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24470998›Full record

ArticleTropical parasitology2013

Spectrum of vaginal discharge in a tertiary care setting.

R Sivaranjini, Tj Jaisankar, Devinder Mohan Thappa, Rashmi Kumari, Laxmisha Chandrasekhar, M Malathi, Sc Parija, S Habeebullah

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Tropical parasitology, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 40 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

R SivaranjiniDepartment of Dermatology, STD and Leprosy, Jawaharlal Institute of Postgraduate Medical Education and Research, Puducherry, India.
Tj JaisankarDepartment of Dermatology, STD and Leprosy, Jawaharlal Institute of Postgraduate Medical Education and Research, Puducherry, India.
Devinder Mohan ThappaDepartment of Dermatology, STD and Leprosy, Jawaharlal Institute of Postgraduate Medical Education and Research, Puducherry, India.
Rashmi KumariDepartment of Dermatology, STD and Leprosy, Jawaharlal Institute of Postgraduate Medical Education and Research, Puducherry, India.
Laxmisha ChandrasekharDepartment of Dermatology, STD and Leprosy, Jawaharlal Institute of Postgraduate Medical Education and Research, Puducherry, India.
M MalathiDepartment of Dermatology, STD and Leprosy, Jawaharlal Institute of Postgraduate Medical Education and Research, Puducherry, India.
Sc ParijaDepartment of Microbiology, Jawaharlal Institute of Postgraduate Medical Education and Research, Puducherry, India.
S HabeebullahDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Jawaharlal Institute of Postgraduate Medical Education and Research, Puducherry, India.
Jawaharlal Institute of Post Graduate Medical Education and Research · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionVaginal discharge is one of the common reasons for gynecological consultation. Many of the causes of vaginitis have a disturbed vaginal microbial ecosystem associated with them. Effective treatment of vaginal discharge requires that the etiologic diagnosis be established and identifying the same offers a precious input to syndromic management and provides an additional strategy for human immunodeficiency virus prevention. The present study was thus carried out to determine the various causes of vaginal discharge in a tertiary care setting. MATERIALS AND

methodsA total of 400 women presenting with vaginal discharge of age between 20 and 50 years, irrespective of marital status were included in this study and women who had used antibiotics or vaginal medication in the previous 14 days and pregnant women were excluded.

resultsOf the 400 women with vaginal discharge studied, a diagnosis was established in 303 women. Infectious causes of vaginal discharge were observed in 207 (51.75%) women. Among them, bacterial vaginosis was the most common cause seen in 105 (26.25%) women. The other infections observed were candidiasis alone (61, 15.25%), trichomoniasis alone (12, 3%), mixed infections (22, 5.5%) and mucopurulent cervicitis (7 of the 130 cases looked for, 8.46%). Among the non-infectious causes, 72 (18%) women had physiological vaginal discharge and 13 (3.3%) women had cervical in situ cancers/carcinoma cervix.

conclusionThe pattern of infectious causes of vaginal discharge observed in our study was comparable with the other studies in India. Our study emphasizes the need for including Papanicolaou smear in the algorithm for evaluation of vaginal discharge, as it helps establish the etiology of vaginal discharge reliably and provides a valuable opportunity to screen for cervical malignancies.

Indexed as

Bacterial vaginosiscandidiasismucopurulent cervicitisTrichomonas vaginalistrichomoniasisvaginal discharge

Identifiers

PMID24470998
PMCPMC3889091
OpenAlexW2022665705

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.