ReviewInfectious disease reports2012
Interdisciplinary approaches to zoonotic disease.
Review in Infectious disease reports, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 25 citations in OpenAlex.
- Using a co-created checklist to improve on-farm biosecurity: an observational pilot intervention with pig farmers and livestock field officers in Sumbawanga, Tanzania.Frontiers in veterinary science · 2025Article
- Covid-19 pandemic in the lens of food safety and security.Environmental research · 2021Article
- Assessing Upstream Determinants of Antibiotic Use in Small-Scale Food Animal Production through a Simulated Client Method.Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020Article
- Using local knowledge in emerging infectious disease research.Social science & medicine (1982) · 2020Article
- Determinants of Childhood Zoonotic Enteric Infections in a Semirural Community of Quito, Ecuador.The American journal of tropical medicine and hygiene · 2020Article
- Mathematically modeling spillovers of an emerging infectious zoonosis with an intermediate host.PloS one · 2020Article
- Knowledge, attitudes, and practices related to anthrax and animal care: A case-control study in Georgia.PloS one · 2019Article
- Frameworks for Preventing, Detecting, and Controlling Zoonotic Diseases.Emerging infectious diseases · 2017Article
- Animal Husbandry Practices and Perceptions of Zoonotic Infectious Disease Risks Among Livestock Keepers in a Rural Parish of Quito, Ecuador.The American journal of tropical medicine and hygiene · 2016Article
- Lessons from the Ebola Outbreak: Action Items for Emerging Infectious Disease Preparedness and Response.EcoHealth · 2016Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
Zoonotic infections are on the increase worldwide, but most research into the biological, environmental and life science aspects of these infections has been conducted in separation. In this review we bring together contemporary research in these areas to suggest a new, symbiotic framework which recognises the interaction of biological, economic, psychological, and natural and built environmental drivers in zoonotic infection and transmission. In doing so, we propose that some contemporary debates in zoonotic research could be resolved using an expanded framework which explicitly takes into account the combination of motivated and habitual human behaviour, environmental and biological constraints, and their interactions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.