Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24470074›Full record

ArticleCancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology2014

Rare coding variants and breast cancer risk: evaluation of susceptibility Loci identified in genome-wide association studies.

Yanfeng Zhang, Jirong Long, Wei Lu, Xiao-Ou Shu, Qiuyin Cai, Ying Zheng, Chun Li, Bingshan Li, Yu-Tang Gao, Wei Zheng

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 30 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Observational
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Clinically Significant Unclassified Variants inCancer research and treatment · 2017
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Yanfeng ZhangAuthors' Affiliations: Division of Epidemiology, Department of Medicine, Vanderbilt Epidemiology Center, Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center; Department of Biostatistics; Department of Molecular Physiology and Biophysics, Center for Human Genetics Research, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, Tennessee; Shanghai Center for Disease Control and Prevention; and Department of Epidemiology, Shanghai Cancer Institute, Shanghai, China.
Jirong Long
Wei Lu
Xiao-Ou Shu
Qiuyin Cai
Ying Zheng
Chun Li
Bingshan Li
Yu-Tang Gao
Wei Zheng
Center for Human Genetics · USShanghai Municipal Center For Disease Control Prevention · CNShanghai Cancer Institute · CNVanderbilt University · US

Funding

Tumor Immunology and Microenvironment Research ProgramP30CA068485 · NCI · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER · PI MATTHEW J TYSKA · 1995 to 2026
$172.8M
Shanghai Womens Health StudyUM1CA182910 · NCI · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER · PI ZHENG, WEI · 2014 to 2018
$5.9M
Cancer Risk Reduction and Diet: A Cohort Study of WomenR37CA070867 · NCI · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER · PI ZHENG, WEI · 2009 to 2013
$4.7M
CANCER RISK REDUCTION AND DIET--A COHORT STUDY OF WOMENR01CA070867 · NCI · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY · PI ZHENG, WEI · 1996 to 2007
$4.6M
Genome Sequencing to identify novel genetic factors for breast cancer riskR01CA158473 · NCI · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER · PI ZHENG, WEI · 2012 to 2016
$4.3M
Consortium Study to Identify Breast Cancer Susceptibility LociR01CA148667 · NCI · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER · PI LONG, JIRONG, ZHENG, WEI · 2011 to 2015
$3.3M
Genetic Factors for Breast Cancer- A genome Wide StudyR01CA124558 · NCI · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY · PI ZHENG, WEI · 2008 to 2012
$3.1M
Genome-wide Copy Number Variation and Breast Cancer RiskR01CA137013 · NCI · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY · PI LONG, JIRONG · 2009 to 2012
$2.4M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA068485NCI NIH HHS R01 CA070867NCI NIH HHS R01 CA124558NCI NIH HHS R01CA124558NCI NIH HHS R01 CA137013NCI NIH HHS R01CA137013NCI NIH HHS R01 CA148667NCI NIH HHS R01CA148667NCI NIH HHS R01 CA158473NCI NIH HHS R01CA158473NCI NIH HHS R37 CA070867NCI NIH HHS R37CA70867NCI NIH HHS UM1 CA182910
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTo date, common genetic variants in approximately 70 loci have been identified for breast cancer via genome-wide association studies (GWAS). It is unknown whether rare variants in these loci are also associated with breast cancer risk.

methodsWe investigated rare missense/nonsense variants with minor allele frequency (MAF) ≤5% located in flanking 500 kb of each of the index single-nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) in 67 GWAS loci. Included in the study were 3,472 cases and 3,595 controls from the Shanghai Breast Cancer Study. Both single marker and gene-based analyses were conducted to investigate the associations.

resultsSingle marker analyses identified 38 missense variants being associated with breast cancer risk at P < 0.05 after adjusting for the index SNP. SNP rs146217902 in the EDEM1 gene and rs200340088 in the EFEMP2 gene were only observed in 8 cases (P = 0.004 for both). SNP rs200995432 in the EFEMP2 gene was associated with increased risk with an OR of 6.2 [95% confidence interval (CI), 1.4-27.6; P = 6.2 × 10(-3)]. SNP rs80358978 in the BRCA2 gene was associated with 16.5-fold elevated risk (95% CI, 2.2-124.5; P = 2.2 × 10(-4)). Gene-based analyses suggested eight genes associated with breast cancer risk at P < 0.05, including the EFEMP2 gene (P = 0.002) and the FBXO18 gene (P = 0.008).

conclusionOur results identified associations of several rare coding variants neighboring common GWAS loci with breast cancer risk. Further investigation of these rare variants and genes would help to understand the biologic mechanisms underlying the associations. IMPACT: Independent studies with larger sample size are warranted to clarify the relationship between these rare variants and breast cancer risk.

Indexed as

Gene FrequencyGenetic LociBreast NeoplasmsCase-Control StudiesFemaleGenetic Predisposition to DiseaseGenome-Wide Association StudyGenotypeHumansMiddle AgedMutation, MissensePolymorphism, Single NucleotideRisk Factors

Identifiers

PMID24470074
PMCPMC3976694
OpenAlexW2145311771

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.