Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24469594›Full record

ArticleNeuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology2014

In vivo imaging of cerebral dopamine D3 receptors in alcoholism.

David Erritzoe, Andri Tziortzi, David Bargiela, Alessandro Colasanti, Graham E Searle, Roger N Gunn, John D Beaver, Adam Waldman, David J Nutt, Massimo Bani and 3 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
5.1field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 58 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Effects of sedative drug use on the dopamine system: a systematic review and meta-analysis of in vivo neuroimaging studies.Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology · 2019
    Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Hazardous drinking and alcohol use disorders.Nature reviews. Disease primers · 2022
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Alcohol and the Brain.Nutrients · 2021
    Review
  8. Exploring regulation and function of dopamine D3 receptors in alcohol use disorder. A PET [Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology · 2021
    Article
  9. Dopamine DDrug and alcohol dependence · 2021
    Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Acute D3 Antagonist GSK598809 Selectively Enhances Neural Response During Monetary Reward Anticipation in Drug and Alcohol Dependence.Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology · 2017
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Abnormalities of Dopamine DJournal of central nervous system disease · 2017
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Elevated Dopamine DNeuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology · 2016
    Article
  19. Heightened Dopaminergic Response to Amphetamine at the DNeuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology · 2016
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

David ErritzoeCentre for Neuropsychopharmacology, Division of Brain Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, London, UK.
Andri Tziortzi1] Clinical Imaging Centre, GlaxoSmithKline, London, UK [2] FMRIB Centre, Department of Clinical Neurology, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
David BargielaCentre for Neuropsychopharmacology, Division of Brain Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, London, UK.
Alessandro Colasanti1] Centre for Neuropsychopharmacology, Division of Brain Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, London, UK [2] Clinical Imaging Centre, GlaxoSmithKline, London, UK.
Graham E SearleClinical Imaging Centre, GlaxoSmithKline, London, UK.
Roger N Gunn1] Clinical Imaging Centre, GlaxoSmithKline, London, UK [2] Division of Brain Sciences, Department of Medicine, Imperial College London, London, UK.
John D BeaverClinical Imaging Centre, GlaxoSmithKline, London, UK.
Adam WaldmanDepartment of Imaging, Charing Cross Hospital, London, UK.
David J NuttCentre for Neuropsychopharmacology, Division of Brain Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, London, UK.
Massimo BaniCEDD for Neurosciences, GlaxoSmithKline, Verona, Italy.
Emilio Merlo-PichCEDD for Neurosciences, GlaxoSmithKline, Verona, Italy.
Eugenii A RabinerClinical Imaging Centre, GlaxoSmithKline, London, UK.
Anne Lingford-HughesCentre for Neuropsychopharmacology, Division of Brain Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, London, UK.
GlaxoSmithKline (United Kingdom) · GBImperial College London · GBGlaxoSmithKline (Italy) · ITCharing Cross Hospital · GB

Funding

Medical Research Council G0802723Medical Research Council G1002226Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Animal studies support the role of the dopamine D3 receptor (DRD3) in alcohol reinforcement or liking. Sustained voluntary alcohol drinking in rats has been associated with an upregulation of striatal DRD3 gene expression and selective blockade of DRD3 reduces ethanol preference, consumption, and cue-induced reinstatement. In vivo measurement of DRD3 in the living human brain has not been possible until recently owing to a lack of suitable tools. In this study, DRD3 status was assessed for the first time in human alcohol addiction. Brain DRD3 availability was compared between 16 male abstinent alcohol-dependent patients and 13 healthy non-dependent age-matched males using the DRD3-preferring agonist positron emission tomography (PET) radioligand [(11)C]PHNO with and without blockade with a selective DRD3 antagonist (GSK598809 60 mg p.o.). In striatal regions of interest, where the [(11)C]PHNO PET signal represents primarily DRD2 binding, no differences were seen in [(11)C]PHNO binding between the groups at baseline. However, baseline [(11)C]PHNO binding was higher in alcohol-dependent patients in hypothalamus (VT: 16.5 ± 4 vs 13.7 ± 2.9, p = 0.040), a region in which the [(11)C]PHNO signal almost entirely reflects DRD3 availability. The reductions in regional receptor binding (VT) following a single oral dose of GSK598809 (60 mg) were consistent with those observed in previous studies across all regions. There were no differences in regional changes in VT following DRD3 blockade between the two groups, indicating that the regional fractions of DRD3 are similar in the two groups, and the increased [(11)C]PHNO binding in the hypothalamus in alcohol-dependent patients is explained by elevated DRD3 in this group. Although we found no difference between alcohol-dependent patients and controls in striatal DRD3 levels, increased DRD3 binding in the hypothalamus of alcohol-dependent patients was observed. This may be relevant to the development of future therapeutic strategies to treat alcohol abuse.

Indexed as

OxazinesAdultAge FactorsAlcoholismAzabicyclo CompoundsCerebral CortexDopamine AntagonistsFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedOxazolesPositron-Emission TomographyProtein BindingPsychiatric Status Rating ScalesReceptors, Dopamine D3Azabicyclo CompoundsDopamine AntagonistsGSK598809naxagolideOxazinesOxazolesReceptors, Dopamine D3

Identifiers

PMID24469594
PMCPMC4023144
OpenAlexW2018491268

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.