Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24469316›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of molecular sciences2014

Cell-based in vitro blood-brain barrier model can rapidly evaluate nanoparticles' brain permeability in association with particle size and surface modification.

Sanshiro Hanada, Kouki Fujioka, Yuriko Inoue, Fumihide Kanaya, Yoshinobu Manome, Kenji Yamamoto

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of molecular sciences, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 76 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
76citing papers in PubMed
6.0field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

76 citing papers in PubMed, 182 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review

16 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Sanshiro HanadaResearch Institute, National Center for Global Health and Medicine, Tokyo 162-8655, Japan. hanada@ri.ncgm.go.jp.
Kouki FujiokaDepartment of Molecular Cell Biology, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo 105-8461, Japan. kfujioka@jikei.ac.jp.
Yuriko InoueDepartment of Anatomy, Toho University, 5-21-16 Omori-Nishi Ota-ku, Tokyo 143-8541, Japan. yuriko.inoue@med.toho-u.ac.jp.
Fumihide KanayaResearch Institute, National Center for Global Health and Medicine, Tokyo 162-8655, Japan. fkanaya@acc.ncgm.go.jp.
Yoshinobu ManomeDepartment of Molecular Cell Biology, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo 105-8461, Japan. manome@jikei.ac.jp.
Kenji YamamotoResearch Institute, National Center for Global Health and Medicine, Tokyo 162-8655, Japan. backen@ri.ncgm.go.jp.
National Center for Global Health and Medicine · JPJikei University School of Medicine · JPToho University · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The possibility of nanoparticle (NP) uptake to the human central nervous system is a major concern. Recent reports showed that in animal models, nanoparticles (NPs) passed through the blood-brain barrier (BBB). For the safe use of NPs, it is imperative to evaluate the permeability of NPs through the BBB. Here we used a commercially available in vitro BBB model to evaluate the permeability of NPs for a rapid, easy and reproducible assay. The model is reconstructed by culturing both primary rat brain endothelial cells and pericytes to support the tight junctions of endothelial cells. We used the permeability coefficient (P(app)) to determine the permeability of NPs. The size dependency results, using fluorescent silica NPs (30, 100, and 400 nm), revealed that the Papp for the 30 nm NPs was higher than those of the larger silica. The surface charge dependency results using Qdots® (amino-, carboxyl-, and PEGylated-Qdots), showed that more amino-Qdots passed through the model than the other Qdots. Usage of serum-containing buffer in the model resulted in an overall reduction of permeability. In conclusion, although additional developments are desired to elucidate the NPs transportation, we showed that the BBB model could be useful as a tool to test the permeability of nanoparticles.

Indexed as

Cell Culture TechniquesAnimalsBlood-Brain BarrierEndothelial CellsNanoparticlesParticle SizePericytesPermeabilityRatsSilicon DioxideSurface PropertiesSilicon Dioxide

Identifiers

PMID24469316
PMCPMC3958822
OpenAlexW2074868130

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.