Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24468780›Full record

Trial reportAntimicrobial agents and chemotherapy2014

Phase I, open-label, safety and pharmacokinetic study to assess bronchopulmonary disposition of intravenous eravacycline in healthy men and women.

Kevin P Connors, Seth T Housman, J Samuel Pope, John Russomanno, Edward Salerno, Eric Shore, Susan Redican, David P Nicolau

Open access · bronzeAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase IRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 50 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
50citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.0field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

50 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 103 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Eravacycline: From broad-spectrum coverage to novel clinical applications.Revista espanola de quimioterapia : publicacion oficial de la Sociedad Espanola de Quimioterapia · 2026
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Treating Extensively Drug-ResistantPathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy · 2025
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Kevin P ConnorsCenter for Anti-Infective Research and Development, Hartford Hospital, Hartford, Connecticut, USA.
Seth T Housman
J Samuel Pope
John Russomanno
Edward Salerno
Eric Shore
Susan Redican
David P Nicolau
Hartford Financial Services (United States)Hartford Hospital · USTetraphase Pharmaceuticals (United States) · US

Funding

PHS HHS HHSO100201200002C
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study evaluated the pulmonary disposition of eravacycline in 20 healthy adult volunteers receiving 1.0 mg of eravacycline/kg intravenously every 12 h for a total of seven doses over 4 days. Plasma samples were collected at 0, 1, 2, 4, 6, and 12 h on day 4, with each subject randomized to undergo a single bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) at 2, 4, 6, or 12 h. Drug concentrations in plasma, BAL fluid, and alveolar macrophages (AM) were determined by liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry, and the urea correction method was used to calculate epithelial lining fluid (ELF) concentrations. Pharmacokinetic parameters were estimated by noncompartmental methods. Penetration for ELF and AM was calculated by using a ratio of the area under the concentration time curve (AUC0-12) for each respective parameter against free drug AUC (fAUC0-12) in plasma. The total AUC0-12 in plasma was 4.56±0.94 μg·h/ml with a mean fAUC0-12 of 0.77±0.14 μg·h/ml. The eravacycline concentrations in ELF and AM at 2, 4, 6, and 12 h were means±the standard deviations (μg/ml) of 0.70±0.30, 0.57±0.20, 0.34±0.16, and 0.25±0.13 with a penetration ratio of 6.44 and 8.25±4.55, 5.15±1.25, 1.77±0.64, and 1.42±1.45 with a penetration ratio of 51.63, respectively. The eravacycline concentrations in the ELF and AM achieved greater levels than plasma by 6- and 50-fold, respectively, supporting further study of eravacycline for patients with respiratory infections.

Indexed as

AdultAnti-Bacterial AgentsFemaleHumansMacrophages, AlveolarMaleTetracyclinesYoung AdultAnti-Bacterial AgentsTetracyclines

Identifiers

PMID24468780
PMCPMC4023791
OpenAlexW2102395861

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.