ArticleGenome biology2014
Identification of evolutionarily meaningful information within the mammalian RNA editing landscape.
Article in Genome biology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- An Evolutionary Landscape of A-to-I RNA Editome across Metazoan Species.Genome biology and evolution · 2018Article
- Adaptation of A-to-I RNA editing in Drosophila.PLoS genetics · 2017Article
- Genome-Wide Characterization of RNA Editing in Chicken Embryos Reveals Common Features among Vertebrates.PloS one · 2015Article
- The RBPome: where the brains meet the brawn.Genome biology · 2014Article
Corrections and comments
- Comment on
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
A large comparative genomic sequence study has determined the extent of conservation between RNA editing sites within the mammalian evolutionary tree.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.