Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24468093›Full record

ArticleBrain stimulation

Motor cortex stimulation suppresses cortical responses to noxious hindpaw stimulation after spinal cord lesion in rats.

Li Jiang, Yadong Ji, Pamela J Voulalas, Michael Keaser, Su Xu, Rao P Gullapalli, Joel Greenspan, Radi Masri

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Brain stimulation. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 33 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Cortical stimulation for chronic pain: from anecdote to evidence.European journal of physical and rehabilitation medicine · 2022
    Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Direct Impact of Motor Cortical Stimulation on the Blood Oxygen-level Dependent Response in Rats.Magnetic resonance in medical sciences : MRMS : an official journal of Japan Society of Magnetic Resonance in Medicine · 2021
    Article
  9. New Developments in Non-invasive Brain Stimulation in Chronic Pain.Current physical medicine and rehabilitation reports · 2020
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Motor Cortex Stimulation for Deafferentation Pain.Current pain and headache reports · 2018
    Review
  13. Cortical Regulation of Nociception of the Trigeminal Nucleus Caudalis.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2017
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Li JiangDepartment of Endodontics, Prosthodontics and Operative Dentistry, University of Maryland School of Dentistry, Baltimore, MD 21201, USA; Program in Neuroscience, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21201, USA.
Yadong JiDepartment of Endodontics, Prosthodontics and Operative Dentistry, University of Maryland School of Dentistry, Baltimore, MD 21201, USA.
Pamela J VoulalasDepartment of Endodontics, Prosthodontics and Operative Dentistry, University of Maryland School of Dentistry, Baltimore, MD 21201, USA; Program in Neuroscience, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21201, USA.
Michael KeaserDepartment of Neural and Pain Sciences, University of Maryland School of Dentistry, Baltimore, MD 21201, USA; Program in Neuroscience, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21201, USA.
Su XuDepartment of Sciences of Diagnostic Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21201, USA; Core for Translational Research in Imaging at Maryland (C-TRIM), University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21201, USA.
Rao P GullapalliDepartment of Sciences of Diagnostic Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21201, USA; Core for Translational Research in Imaging at Maryland (C-TRIM), University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21201, USA.
Joel GreenspanDepartment of Neural and Pain Sciences, University of Maryland School of Dentistry, Baltimore, MD 21201, USA; Program in Neuroscience, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21201, USA.
Radi MasriDepartment of Endodontics, Prosthodontics and Operative Dentistry, University of Maryland School of Dentistry, Baltimore, MD 21201, USA; Program in Neuroscience, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21201, USA; Department of Anatomy and Neurobiology, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21201, USA. Electronic address: Radi.masri@gmail.com.
University of Maryland, Baltimore · US

Funding

Motor Cortex Stimulation Reverses Maladaptive Plasticity Following Spinal InjuryR01NS069568 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND BALTIMORE · PI MASRI, RADI · 2010 to 2014
$1.4M
Antinociceptive Mechanisms of Repetitve Motor Cortex StimulationF32NS084680 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND BALTIMORE · PI JIANG, LI · 2014 to 2014
$56k
NINDS NIH HHS F32 NS084680NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS069568NINDS NIH HHS R01-NS069568
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMotor cortex stimulation (MCS) is a potentially effective treatment for chronic neuropathic pain. The neural mechanisms underlying the reduction of hyperalgesia and allodynia after MCS are not completely understood.

objectiveTo investigate the neural mechanisms responsible for analgesic effects after MCS. We test the hypothesis that MCS attenuates evoked blood oxygen-level dependent signals in cortical areas involved in nociceptive processing in an animal model of chronic neuropathic pain.

methodsWe used adult female Sprague-Dawley rats (n = 10) that received unilateral electrolytic lesions of the right spinal cord at the level of C6 (SCL animals). In these animals, we performed magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) experiments to study the analgesic effects of MCS. On the day of fMRI experiment, 14 days after spinal cord lesion, the animals were anesthetized and epidural bipolar platinum electrodes were placed above the left primary motor cortex. Two 10-min sessions of fMRI were performed before and after a session of MCS (50 μA, 50 Hz, 300 μs, for 30 min). During each fMRI session, the right hindpaw was electrically stimulated (noxious stimulation: 5 mA, 5 Hz, 3 ms) using a block design of 20 s stimulation off and 20 s stimulation on. A general linear model-based statistical parametric analysis was used to analyze whole brain activation maps. Region of interest (ROI) analysis and paired t-test were used to compare changes in activation before and after MCS in these ROI.

resultsMCS suppressed evoked blood oxygen dependent signals significantly (Family-wise error corrected P < 0.05) and bilaterally in 2 areas heavily implicated in nociceptive processing. These areas consisted of the primary somatosensory cortex and the prefrontal cortex.

conclusionsThese findings suggest that, in animals with SCL, MCS attenuates hypersensitivity by suppressing activity in the primary somatosensory cortex and prefrontal cortex.

Indexed as

AnimalsBrain MappingDisease Models, AnimalElectric Stimulation TherapyFemaleFootHyperalgesiaMagnetic Resonance ImagingMotor CortexNeuralgiaPrefrontal CortexRatsRats, Sprague-DawleySomatosensory CortexSpinal Cord InjuriesCentral painFunctional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI)Motor cortex stimulationNeuropathic painNoxious electrical stimulation

Identifiers

PMID24468093
PMCPMC4000711
OpenAlexW2022134769

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.