ArticleMicrobial informatics and experimentation2014
A systematic search for discriminating sites in the 16S ribosomal RNA gene.
Article in Microbial informatics and experimentation, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- Creating unity: linking 16S rRNA gene sequence information to the core taxonomy of genomes.Environmental microbiome · 2025Article
- Learning, visualizing and exploring 16S rRNA structure using an attention-based deep neural network.PLoS computational biology · 2021Article
- Consistency of Targeted Metatranscriptomics and Morphological Characterization of Phytoplankton Communities.Frontiers in microbiology · 2020Article
- Article
- Size-variable zone in V3 region of 16S rRNA.RNA biology · 2017Article
- Identification and Analysis of Informative Single Nucleotide Polymorphisms in 16S rRNA Gene Sequences of the Bacillus cereus Group.Journal of clinical microbiology · 2016Article
- Comparing K-mer based methods for improved classification of 16S sequences.BMC bioinformatics · 2015Article
- Fine-scale analysis of 16S rRNA sequences reveals a high level of taxonomic diversity among vaginal Atopobium spp.Pathogens and disease · 2015Article
- Estimating bacterial diversity for ecological studies: methods, metrics, and assumptions.PloS one · 2015Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe 16S rRNA is by far the most common genomic marker used for prokaryotic classification, and has been used extensively in metagenomic studies over recent years. Along the 16S gene there are regions with more or less variation across the kingdom of bacteria. Nine variable regions have been identified, flanked by more conserved parts of the sequence. It has been stated that the discriminatory power of the 16S marker lies in these variable regions. In the present study we wanted to examine this more closely, and used a supervised learning method to search systematically for sites that contribute to correct classification at either the phylum or genus level.
resultsWhen classifying phyla the site selection algorithm located 50 discriminative sites. These were scattered over most of the alignments and only around half of them were located in the variable regions. The selected sites did, however, have an entropy significantly larger than expected, meaning they are sites of large variation. We found that the discriminative sites typically have a large entropy compared to their closest neighbours along the alignments. When classifying genera the site selection algorithm needed around 80% of the sites in the 16S gene before the classification error reached a minimum. This means that all variation, in both variable and conserved regions, is needed in order to separate genera.
conclusionsOur findings does not support the statement that the discriminative power of the 16S gene is located only in the variable regions. Variable regions are important, but just as many discriminative sites are found in the more conserved parts. The discriminative power is typically found in sites of large variation located inside shorter regions of higher conservation.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.