Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24466497›Full record

ArticleBiomedical optics express2013

Depth-resolved model-based reconstruction of attenuation coefficients in optical coherence tomography.

K A Vermeer, J Mo, J J A Weda, H G Lemij, J F de Boer

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biomedical optics express, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 186 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
186citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

186 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Influence of Room Illumination on Corneal Densitometry.Translational vision science & technology · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

126 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

K A VermeerRotterdam Ophthalmic Institute, Rotterdam Eye Hospital, P.O. Box 70030, 3000 LM Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
J MoLaserLaB Amsterdam, VU University De Boelelaan 1081, 1081 HV Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
J J A WedaLaserLaB Amsterdam, VU University De Boelelaan 1081, 1081 HV Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
H G LemijGlaucoma Service, Rotterdam Eye Hospital, P.O. Box 70030, 3000 LM Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
J F de BoerRotterdam Ophthalmic Institute, Rotterdam Eye Hospital, P.O. Box 70030, 3000 LM Rotterdam, The Netherlands ; LaserLaB Amsterdam, VU University De Boelelaan 1081, 1081 HV Amsterdam, The Netherlands ; Dept. of Physics and Astronomy, VU University De Boelelaan 1081, 1081 HV Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We present a method, based on a single scattering model, to calculate the attenuation coefficient of each pixel in optical coherence tomography (OCT) depth profiles. Numerical simulations were used to determine the model's response to different depths and attenuation coefficients. Experiments were performed on uniform and layered phantoms with varying attenuation coefficients. They were measured by a 1300 nm OCT system and their attenuation coefficients were evaluated by our proposed method and by fitting the OCT slope as the gold standard. Both methods showed largely consistent results for the uniform phantoms. On the layered phantom, only our proposed method accurately estimated the attenuation coefficients. For all phantoms, the proposed method largely reduced the variability of the estimated attenuation coefficients. The method was illustrated on an in-vivo retinal OCT scan, effectively removing common imaging artifacts such as shadowing. By providing localized, per-pixel attenuation coefficients, this method enables tissue characterization based on attenuation coefficient estimates from OCT data.

Indexed as

(110.3010) Image reconstruction techniques(110.3200) Inverse scattering(110.4500) Optical coherence tomography(170.4500) Optical coherence tomography(170.4580) Optical diagnostics for medicine(170.6935) Tissue characterization

Identifiers

PMID24466497
PMCPMC3891343

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.