Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24466478›Full record

ArticleBiomedical optics express2013

Towards clinically translatable NIR fluorescence molecular guidance for colonoscopy.

P Beatriz Garcia-Allende, Jürgen Glatz, Maximilian Koch, Jolien J Tjalma, Elmire Hartmans, Anton G T Terwisscha van Scheltinga, Panagiotis Symvoulidis, Gooitzen M van Dam, Wouter B Nagengast, Vasilis Ntziachristos

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biomedical optics express, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 40 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

P Beatriz Garcia-AllendeChair for Biological Imaging & Institute for Biological and Medical Imaging, Technische Universität München and Helmholtz Zentrum München, Trogerstr. 9 D-81675, München, Germany.
Jürgen GlatzChair for Biological Imaging & Institute for Biological and Medical Imaging, Technische Universität München and Helmholtz Zentrum München, Trogerstr. 9 D-81675, München, Germany.
Maximilian KochChair for Biological Imaging & Institute for Biological and Medical Imaging, Technische Universität München and Helmholtz Zentrum München, Trogerstr. 9 D-81675, München, Germany.
Jolien J TjalmaDept. of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, UMCG, Hanzeplein 1, 9700 RB, Groningen, Netherlands.
Elmire HartmansDept. of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, UMCG, Hanzeplein 1, 9700 RB, Groningen, Netherlands.
Anton G T Terwisscha van ScheltingaDept. of Hospital and Clinical Pharmacy, UMCG University of Groningen, Hanzeplein 1, 9700 RB, Groningen, Netherlands.
Panagiotis SymvoulidisChair for Biological Imaging & Institute for Biological and Medical Imaging, Technische Universität München and Helmholtz Zentrum München, Trogerstr. 9 D-81675, München, Germany.
Gooitzen M van DamDept. of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, UMCG, Hanzeplein 1, 9700 RB, Groningen, Netherlands.
Wouter B NagengastDept. of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, UMCG, Hanzeplein 1, 9700 RB, Groningen, Netherlands.
Vasilis NtziachristosChair for Biological Imaging & Institute for Biological and Medical Imaging, Technische Universität München and Helmholtz Zentrum München, Trogerstr. 9 D-81675, München, Germany.
Laboratoire d’Imagerie Biomédicale · FRTechnical University of Munich · DEUniversity of Groningen · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

White-light surveillance colonoscopy is the standard of care for the detection and removal of premalignant lesions to prevent colorectal cancer, and the main screening recommendation following treatment for recurrence detection. However, it lacks sufficient diagnostic yield, exhibits unacceptable adenoma miss-rates and is not capable of revealing functional and morphological information of the detected lesions. Fluorescence molecular guidance in the near-infrared (NIR) is expected to have outstanding relevance regarding early lesion detection and heterogeneity characterization within and among lesions in these interventional procedures. Thereby, superficial and sub-surface tissue biomarkers can be optimally visualized due to a minimization of tissue attenuation and autofluorescence by comparison with the visible, which simultaneously enhance tissue penetration and assure minimal background. At present, this potential is challenged by the difficulty associated with the clinical propagation of disease-specific contrast agents and the absence of a commercially available endoscope that is capable of acquiring wide-field, NIR fluorescence at video-rates. We propose two alternative flexible endoscopic fluorescence imaging methods, each based on a CE certified commercial, clinical grade endoscope, and the employment of an approved monoclonal antibody labeled with a clinically applicable NIR fluorophore. Pre-clinical validation of these two strategies that aim at bridging NIR fluorescence molecular guidance to clinical translation is demonstrated in this study.

Indexed as

(170.2150) Endoscopic imaging(170.2680) Gastrointestinal

Identifiers

PMID24466478
PMCPMC3891347
OpenAlexW2157734829

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.