ArticleBiomedical optics express2013
0.5 gigapixel microscopy using a flatbed scanner.
Article in Biomedical optics express, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 15 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed, 41 citations in OpenAlex.
- Near-Space Wide-Area and High-Resolution Imaging System Design and Implementation.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Contemporary Whole Slide Imaging Devices and Their Applications within the Modern Pathology Department: A Selected Hardware Review.Journal of pathology informatics · 2021Review
- Low-cost, sub-micron resolution, wide-field computational microscopy using opensource hardware.Scientific reports · 2019Article
- Homographically generated light sheets for the microscopy of large specimens.Optics letters · 2018Article
- A modular, open-source, slide-scanning microscope for diagnostic applications in resource-constrained settings.PloS one · 2018Article
- Dictionary-enhanced imaging cytometry.Scientific reports · 2017Article
- Imaging far and wide.eLife · 2016Article
- Article
- Incubator embedded cell culture imaging system (EmSight) based on Fourier ptychographic microscopy.Biomedical optics express · 2016Article
- Erratum: 0.5 gigapixel microscopy using a flatbed scanner: erratum.Biomedical optics express · 2016Article
- A wide field-of-view scanning endoscope for whole anal canal imaging.Biomedical optics express · 2015Article
- FPscope: a field-portable high-resolution microscope using a cellphone lens.Biomedical optics express · 2014Article
- Biomedical imaging and sensing using flatbed scanners.Lab on a chip · 2014Review
- Embedded pupil function recovery for Fourier ptychographic microscopy.Optics express · 2014Article
- Advances in optics for biotechnology, medicine and surgery.Biomedical optics express · 2014Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
The capability to perform high-resolution, wide field-of-view (FOV) microscopy imaging is highly sought after in biomedical applications. In this paper, we report a wide FOV microscopy system that uses a closed-circuit-television (CCTV) lens for image relay and a flatbed scanner for data acquisition. We show that such an imaging system is capable of capturing a 10 mm × 7.5 mm FOV image with 0.78 µm resolution, resulting in more than 0.5 billion pixels across the entire image. The resolution and field curve of the proposed system were characterized by imaging a USAF resolution target and a hole-array target. To demonstrate its application, 0.5 gigapixel images of histology slides were acquired using this system.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.