Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24466214›Full record

ArticlePloS one2014

Prediction of aptamer-target interacting pairs with pseudo-amino acid composition.

Bi-Qing Li, Yu-Chao Zhang, Guo-Hua Huang, Wei-Ren Cui, Ning Zhang, Yu-Dong Cai

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 59 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. APIPred: An XGBoost-Based Method for Predicting Aptamer-Protein Interactions.Journal of chemical information and modeling · 2024
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Using an Ensemble to Identify and Classify Macroalgae Antimicrobial Peptides.Interdisciplinary sciences, computational life sciences · 2021
    Article
  17. Artificial Intelligence in Aptamer-Target Binding Prediction.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Bi-Qing LiKey Laboratory of Systems Biology, Shanghai Institutes for Biological Sciences, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shanghai, P. R. China.
Yu-Chao ZhangState Key Laboratory of Medical Genomics, Institute of Health Sciences, Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine and Shanghai Institutes for Biological Sciences, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shanghai, P. R. China.
Guo-Hua HuangInstitute of Systems Biology, Shanghai University, Shanghai, P.R. China.
Wei-Ren CuiCAS-MPG Partner Institute for Computational Biology, Shanghai Institutes for Biological Sciences, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shanghai, P. R. China.
Ning ZhangDepartment of Biomedical Engineering Tianjin University, Tianjin Key Lab of BME Measurement, Tianjin, P. R. China.
Yu-Dong CaiInstitute of Systems Biology, Shanghai University, Shanghai, P.R. China.
Chinese Academy of Sciences · CNShanghai University · CNShanghai Institutes for Biological Sciences · CNTianjin University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Aptamers are oligonucleic acid or peptide molecules that bind to specific target molecules. As a novel and powerful class of ligands, aptamers are thought to have excellent potential for applications in the fields of biosensing, diagnostics and therapeutics. In this study, a new method for predicting aptamer-target interacting pairs was proposed by integrating features derived from both aptamers and their targets. Features of nucleotide composition and traditional amino acid composition as well as pseudo amino acid were utilized to represent aptamers and targets, respectively. The predictor was constructed based on Random Forest and the optimal features were selected by using the maximum relevance minimum redundancy (mRMR) method and the incremental feature selection (IFS) method. As a result, 81.34% accuracy and 0.4612 MCC were obtained for the training dataset, and 77.41% accuracy and 0.3717 MCC were achieved for the testing dataset. An optimal feature set of 220 features were selected, which were considered as the ones that contributed significantly to the interacting aptamer-target pair predictions. Analysis of the optimal feature set indicated several important factors in determining aptamer-target interactions. It is anticipated that our prediction method may become a useful tool for identifying aptamer-target pairs and the features selected and analyzed in this study may provide useful insights into the mechanism of interactions between aptamers and targets.

Indexed as

Models, GeneticAlgorithmsAmino AcidsAptamers, NucleotideAptamers, PeptideArtificial IntelligenceBase CompositionComputational BiologyLigandsStructure-Activity RelationshipAmino AcidsAptamers, NucleotideAptamers, PeptideLigands

Identifiers

PMID24466214
PMCPMC3899287
OpenAlexW2025820428

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.