Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24466124›Full record

ArticlePloS one2014

Selection and evaluation of potential reference genes for gene expression analysis in the brown planthopper, Nilaparvata lugens (Hemiptera: Delphacidae) using reverse-transcription quantitative PCR.

Miao Yuan, Yanhui Lu, Xun Zhu, Hu Wan, Muhammad Shakeel, Sha Zhan, Byung-Rae Jin, Jianhong Li

Open access · goldAbstract readEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 83 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
83citing papers in PubMed
8.1field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

83 citing papers in PubMed, 190 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Selection ofInsects · 2025
    Article
  5. Selection ofInsects · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. A Novel Cuticular Protein-likeInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Role ofInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

23 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Miao YuanLaboratory of Pesticide, College of Plant Science & Technology, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan, China.
Yanhui LuLaboratory of Pesticide, College of Plant Science & Technology, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan, China.
Xun ZhuLaboratory of Pesticide, College of Plant Science & Technology, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan, China.
Hu WanLaboratory of Pesticide, College of Plant Science & Technology, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan, China.
Muhammad ShakeelLaboratory of Pesticide, College of Plant Science & Technology, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan, China.
Sha ZhanLaboratory of Pesticide, College of Plant Science & Technology, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan, China.
Byung-Rae JinLaboratory of Insect Molecular Biology and Biotechnology, Department of Applied Biology, College of Natural Resources and Life Science, Dong-A University, Busan, Korea.
Jianhong LiLaboratory of Pesticide, College of Plant Science & Technology, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan, China.
Huazhong Agricultural University · CNDong-A University · KR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The brown planthopper (BPH), Nilaparvata lugens (Hemiptera, Delphacidae), is one of the most important rice pests. Abundant genetic studies on BPH have been conducted using reverse-transcription quantitative real-time PCR (qRT-PCR). Using qRT-PCR, the expression levels of target genes are calculated on the basis of endogenous controls. These genes need to be appropriately selected by experimentally assessing whether they are stably expressed under different conditions. However, such studies on potential reference genes in N. lugens are lacking. In this paper, we presented a systematic exploration of eight candidate reference genes in N. lugens, namely, actin 1 (ACT), muscle actin (MACT), ribosomal protein S11 (RPS11), ribosomal protein S15e (RPS15), alpha 2-tubulin (TUB), elongation factor 1 delta (EF), 18S ribosomal RNA (18S), and arginine kinase (AK) and used four alternative methods (BestKeeper, geNorm, NormFinder, and the delta Ct method) to evaluate the suitability of these genes as endogenous controls. We examined their expression levels among different experimental factors (developmental stage, body part, geographic population, temperature variation, pesticide exposure, diet change, and starvation) following the MIQE (Minimum Information for publication of Quantitative real time PCR Experiments) guidelines. Based on the results of RefFinder, which integrates four currently available major software programs to compare and rank the tested candidate reference genes, RPS15, RPS11, and TUB were found to be the most suitable reference genes in different developmental stages, body parts, and geographic populations, respectively. RPS15 was the most suitable gene under different temperature and diet conditions, while RPS11 was the most suitable gene under different pesticide exposure and starvation conditions. This work sheds light on establishing a standardized qRT-PCR procedure in N. lugens, and serves as a starting point for screening for reference genes for expression studies of related insects.

Indexed as

Gene Expression ProfilingAnimalsDietGene Expression Regulation, DevelopmentalGenes, InsectHemipteraOryzaPesticidesReal-Time Polymerase Chain ReactionReference StandardsReverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain ReactionRNA, MessengerSeedsStress, PhysiologicalTemperaturePesticidesRNA, Messenger

Identifiers

PMID24466124
PMCPMC3900570
OpenAlexW1980469442

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.