ArticlePloS one2014
Application of microarray and functional-based screening methods for the detection of antimicrobial resistance genes in the microbiomes of healthy humans.
Article in PloS one, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
28 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 61 citations in OpenAlex.
- Systematic review of human gut resistome studies revealed variable definitions and approaches.Gut microbes · 2020Pooled it
- A Novel Multiplex Fluorescent PCR Assay for the Simultaneous Detection of Seven Aminoglycoside Resistance Genes.Journal of fluorescence · 2025Article
- Spectral Precision: Recent Advances in Matrix-Assisted Laser Desorption/Ionization Time-of-Flight Mass Spectrometry for Pathogen Detection and Resistance Profiling.Microorganisms · 2025Review
- ResFinderFG v2.0: a database of antibiotic resistance genes obtained by functional metagenomics.Nucleic acids research · 2023Article
- Distribution ofPathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Article
- Impact of Chronic Tetracycline Exposure on Human Intestinal Microbiota in a Continuous Flow Bioreactor Model.Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Article
- Functional Annotation Genome Unravels Potential ProbioticFoods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Article
- Functional Metagenomic Screening for Antimicrobial Resistance in the Oral Microbiome.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2021Article
- Effect of membrane fusion protein AdeT1 on the antimicrobial resistance of Escherichia coli.Scientific reports · 2020Article
- Article
- Two antimicrobial genes from Aegilops tauschii Cosson identified by the Bacillus subtilis expression system.Scientific reports · 2020Article
- Current state of the art in rapid diagnostics for antimicrobial resistance.Lab on a chip · 2020Review
- Characterizing Antimicrobial ResistantFrontiers in microbiology · 2020Article
- Article
- Erythromycin-resistant lactic acid bacteria in the healthy gut of vegans, ovo-lacto vegetarians and omnivores.PloS one · 2019Article
- Molecular Methods for Detection of Antimicrobial Resistance.Microbiology spectrum · 2017Review
- Genomic insights into the virulence and salt tolerance of Staphylococcus equorum.Scientific reports · 2017Article
- Stochasticity among Antibiotic-Resistance Profiles of Common Burn-Related Pathogens over a Six-Year Period.Surgical infections · 2017Observational
- Detection of antibiotic resistance genes in the feces of young adult Japanese.Bioscience of microbiota, food and health · 2017Article
- Efflux in the Oral Metagenome: The Discovery of a Novel Tetracycline and Tigecycline ABC Transporter.Frontiers in microbiology · 2016Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The aim of this study was to screen for the presence of antimicrobial resistance genes within the saliva and faecal microbiomes of healthy adult human volunteers from five European countries. Two non-culture based approaches were employed to obviate potential bias associated with difficult to culture members of the microbiota. In a gene target-based approach, a microarray was employed to screen for the presence of over 70 clinically important resistance genes in the saliva and faecal microbiomes. A total of 14 different resistance genes were detected encoding resistances to six antibiotic classes (aminoglycosides, β-lactams, macrolides, sulphonamides, tetracyclines and trimethoprim). The most commonly detected genes were erm(B), blaTEM, and sul2. In a functional-based approach, DNA prepared from pooled saliva samples was cloned into Escherichia coli and screened for expression of resistance to ampicillin or sulphonamide, two of the most common resistances found by array. The functional ampicillin resistance screen recovered genes encoding components of a predicted AcrRAB efflux pump. In the functional sulphonamide resistance screen, folP genes were recovered encoding mutant dihydropteroate synthase, the target of sulphonamide action. The genes recovered from the functional screens were from the chromosomes of commensal species that are opportunistically pathogenic and capable of exchanging DNA with related pathogenic species. Genes identified by microarray were not recovered in the activity-based screen, indicating that these two methods can be complementary in facilitating the identification of a range of resistance mechanisms present within the human microbiome. It also provides further evidence of the diverse reservoir of resistance mechanisms present in bacterial populations in the human gut and saliva. In future the methods described in this study can be used to monitor changes in the resistome in response to antibiotic therapy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.