Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24466054›Full record

ArticlePloS one2014

Functional MRI of the olfactory system in conscious dogs.

Hao Jia, Oleg M Pustovyy, Paul Waggoner, Ronald J Beyers, John Schumacher, Chester Wildey, Jay Barrett, Edward Morrison, Nouha Salibi, Thomas S Denney and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 36 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
36citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

36 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Neuroanatomical asymmetry in the canine brain.Brain structure & function · 2023
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Extensive Connections of the Canine Olfactory Pathway Revealed by Tractography and Dissection.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2022
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Hao JiaMRI Research Center, Department of Electrical & Computer Engineering, Auburn University, Auburn, Alabama, United States of America.
Oleg M PustovyyDepartment of Anatomy, Physiology & Pharmacology, Auburn University, Auburn, Alabama, United States of America.
Paul WaggonerCanine Detection Research Institute, Auburn University, Auburn, Alabama, United States of America.
Ronald J BeyersMRI Research Center, Department of Electrical & Computer Engineering, Auburn University, Auburn, Alabama, United States of America.
John SchumacherDepartment of Clinical Sciences, Auburn University, Auburn, Alabama, United States of America.
Chester WildeyMRRA Inc., Euless, Texas, United States of America.
Jay BarrettCollege of Veterinary Medicine, Auburn University, Auburn, Alabama, United States of America.
Edward MorrisonDepartment of Anatomy, Physiology & Pharmacology, Auburn University, Auburn, Alabama, United States of America.
Nouha SalibiMR R&D, Siemens Healthcare, Malvern, Pennsylvania, United States of America.
Thomas S DenneyMRI Research Center, Department of Electrical & Computer Engineering, Auburn University, Auburn, Alabama, United States of America ; Department of Psychology, Auburn University, Auburn, Alabama, United States of America.
Vitaly J VodyanoyDepartment of Anatomy, Physiology & Pharmacology, Auburn University, Auburn, Alabama, United States of America.
Gopikrishna DeshpandeMRI Research Center, Department of Electrical & Computer Engineering, Auburn University, Auburn, Alabama, United States of America ; Department of Psychology, Auburn University, Auburn, Alabama, United States of America.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We depend upon the olfactory abilities of dogs for critical tasks such as detecting bombs, landmines, other hazardous chemicals and illicit substances. Hence, a mechanistic understanding of the olfactory system in dogs is of great scientific interest. Previous studies explored this aspect at the cellular and behavior levels; however, the cognitive-level neural substrates linking them have never been explored. This is critical given the fact that behavior is driven by filtered sensory representations in higher order cognitive areas rather than the raw odor maps of the olfactory bulb. Since sedated dogs cannot sniff, we investigated this using functional magnetic resonance imaging of conscious dogs. We addressed the technical challenges of head motion using a two pronged strategy of behavioral training to keep dogs' head as still as possible and a single camera optical head motion tracking system to account for residual jerky movements. We built a custom computer-controlled odorant delivery system which was synchronized with image acquisition, allowing the investigation of brain regions activated by odors. The olfactory bulb and piriform lobes were commonly activated in both awake and anesthetized dogs, while the frontal cortex was activated mainly in conscious dogs. Comparison of responses to low and high odor intensity showed differences in either the strength or spatial extent of activation in the olfactory bulb, piriform lobes, cerebellum, and frontal cortex. Our results demonstrate the viability of the proposed method for functional imaging of the olfactory system in conscious dogs. This could potentially open up a new field of research in detector dog technology.

Indexed as

Olfactory PerceptionAnimalsBrain MappingConsciousnessDogsFrontal LobeMagnetic Resonance ImagingOlfactory BulbOlfactory Pathways

Identifiers

PMID24466054
PMCPMC3900535

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.