Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24465970›Full record

ArticlePloS one2014

Responses to telomere erosion in plants.

Simon Amiard, Olivier Da Ines, Maria Eugenia Gallego, Charles I White

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Ectothermic telomeres: it's time they came in from the cold.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2018
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Simon AmiardGénétique, Reproduction et Développement, Unité Mixte de Recherche 6293, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique - Clermont Université - Unité 1103, Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale, Aubière, France.
Olivier Da InesGénétique, Reproduction et Développement, Unité Mixte de Recherche 6293, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique - Clermont Université - Unité 1103, Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale, Aubière, France.
Maria Eugenia GallegoGénétique, Reproduction et Développement, Unité Mixte de Recherche 6293, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique - Clermont Université - Unité 1103, Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale, Aubière, France.
Charles I WhiteGénétique, Reproduction et Développement, Unité Mixte de Recherche 6293, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique - Clermont Université - Unité 1103, Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale, Aubière, France.
Université Clermont Auvergne · FRGenetique Reproduction and Developpement · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In striking contrast to animals, plants are able to develop and reproduce in the presence of significant levels of genome damage. This is seen clearly in both the viability of plants carrying knockouts for key recombination and DNA repair genes, which are lethal in vertebrates, and in the impact of telomere dysfunction. Telomerase knockout mice show accelerated ageing and severe developmental phenotypes, with effects on both highly proliferative and on more quiescent tissues, while cell death in Arabidopsis tert mutants is mostly restricted to actively dividing meristematic cells. Through phenotypic and whole-transcriptome RNAseq studies, we present here an analysis of the response of Arabidopsis plants to the continued presence of telomere damage. Comparison of second-generation and seventh-generation tert mutant plants has permitted separation of the effects of the absence of the telomerase enzyme and the ensuing chromosome damage. In addition to identifying a large number of genes affected by telomere damage, many of which are of unknown function, the striking conclusion of this study is the clear difference observed at both cellular and transcriptome levels between the ways in which mammals and plants respond to chronic telomeric damage.

Indexed as

ArabidopsisArabidopsis ProteinsChromosomes, PlantDNA DamageGenomic InstabilityTelomeraseTelomereTranscriptomeArabidopsis ProteinsTelomerase

Identifiers

PMID24465970
PMCPMC3897657
OpenAlexW2038539980

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.