Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24465960›Full record

ArticlePloS one2014

Impact of the CYP3A5, CYP3A4, COMT, IL-10 and POR genetic polymorphisms on tacrolimus metabolism in Chinese renal transplant recipients.

Chuan-Jiang Li, Liang Li, Li Lin, Hai-Xia Jiang, Ze-Yan Zhong, Wei-Mo Li, Yan-Jun Zhang, Ping Zheng, Xu-Hui Tan, Lin Zhou

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 38 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
38citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
7.6field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

38 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 77 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Impact ofFrontiers in pharmacology · 2025
    Article
  10. Synergistic Effect of Cytochrome P450 Family 3 Subfamily A Member 5 (ACS pharmacology & translational science · 2024
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Chuan-Jiang LiDepartment of Surgery, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, PR China.
Liang LiDepartment of Medical Genetics, School of Basic Medical Sciences, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, PR China.
Li LinDepartment of Medical Genetics, School of Basic Medical Sciences, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, PR China.
Hai-Xia JiangDepartment of Clinical Laboratory, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, PR China.
Ze-Yan ZhongDepartment of Medical Genetics, School of Basic Medical Sciences, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, PR China.
Wei-Mo LiDepartment of Surgery, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, PR China.
Yan-Jun ZhangCollege of Pharmacy, University of Cincinnati Academic Health Centre, Cincinnati, Ohio, United States of America.
Ping ZhengDepartment of Pharmacy, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, PR China.
Xu-Hui TanDepartment of Biostatistics, School of Public Health and Tropical Medicine, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, PR China.
Lin ZhouDepartment of Medical Genetics, School of Basic Medical Sciences, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, PR China.
Southern Medical University · CNNanfang Hospital · CNUniversity of Cincinnati Medical Center · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Tacrolimus is a widely used immunosuppressive drug for preventing the rejection of solid organ transplants. The efficacy of tacrolimus shows considerable variability, which might be related to genetic variation among recipients. We conducted a retrospective study of 240 Chinese renal transplant recipients receiving tacrolimus as immunosuppressive drug. The retrospective data of all patients were collected for 40 days after transplantation. Seventeen SNPs of CYP3A5, CYP3A4, COMT, IL-10 and POR were identified by the SNaPshot assay. Tacrolimus blood concentrations were obtained on days 1-3, days 6-8 and days 12-14 after transplantation, as well as during the period of the predefined therapeutic concentration range. Kruskal-Wallis test was used to examine the effect of genetic variation on the tacrolimus concentration/dose ratio (C 0/D) at different time points. Chi-square test was used to compare the proportions of patients who achieved the target C 0 range in the different genotypic groups at weeks 1, 2, 3 and 4 after transplantation. After correction for multiple testing, there was a significant association of C 0/D with CYP3A5*3, CYP3A4*1G and CYP3A4 rs4646437 T>C at different time points after transplantation. The proportion of patients in the IL-10 rs1800871-TT group who achieved the target C 0 range was greater (p = 0.004) compared to the IL-10 rs1800871-CT and IL-10 rs1800871-CC groups at week 3 after transplantation. CYP3A5*3, CYP3A4 *1G, CYP3A4 rs4646437 T>C and IL-10 rs1800871 C>T might be potential polymorphisms affecting the interindividual variability in tacrolimus metabolism among Chinese renal transplant recipients.

Indexed as

AdultAsian PeopleCatechol O-MethyltransferaseCytochrome P-450 CYP3AFemaleHumansImmunosuppressive AgentsInterleukin-10Kidney TransplantationMaleNADPH-Ferrihemoprotein ReductasePolymorphism, Single NucleotideRetrospective StudiesTacrolimusCatechol O-MethyltransferaseCOMT protein, humanCYP3A4 protein, humanCYP3A5 protein, humanCytochrome P-450 CYP3AIL10 protein, humanImmunosuppressive AgentsInterleukin-10NADPH-Ferrihemoprotein ReductaseTacrolimus

Identifiers

PMID24465960
PMCPMC3897654
OpenAlexW1964908406

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.