Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24465958›Full record

Trial reportPloS one2014

Improving ambulatory saliva-sampling compliance in pregnant women: a randomized controlled study.

Julian Moeller, Roselind Lieb, Andrea H Meyer, Katharina Quack Loetscher, Bettina Krastel, Gunther Meinlschmidt

Open access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in PloS one, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 48% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Julian MoellerUniversity of Basel, Department of Psychology, Division of Clinical Psychology and Epidemiology, Basel, Switzerland ; Diagnostic and Crisis Intervention Centre, Department of Psychiatry, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland.
Roselind LiebUniversity of Basel, Department of Psychology, Division of Clinical Psychology and Epidemiology, Basel, Switzerland.
Andrea H MeyerUniversity of Basel, Department of Psychology, Division of Clinical Psychology and Epidemiology, Basel, Switzerland.
Katharina Quack LoetscherDepartment of Obstetrics, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Bettina KrastelNational Centre of Competence in Research (NCCR), Swiss Etiological Study of Adjustment and Mental Health (sesam), University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland.
Gunther MeinlschmidtUniversity of Basel, Department of Psychology, Division of Clinical Psychology and Epidemiology, Basel, Switzerland ; National Centre of Competence in Research (NCCR), Swiss Etiological Study of Adjustment and Mental Health (sesam), University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland ; Faculty of Medicine, Ruhr-University Bochum, Bochum, Germany.
University of Basel · CHRuhr University Bochum · DEUniversity Hospital of Zurich · CH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveNoncompliance with scheduled ambulatory saliva sampling is common and has been associated with biased cortisol estimates in nonpregnant subjects. This study is the first to investigate in pregnant women strategies to improve ambulatory saliva-sampling compliance, and the association between sampling noncompliance and saliva cortisol estimates.

methodsWe instructed 64 pregnant women to collect eight scheduled saliva samples on two consecutive days each. Objective compliance with scheduled sampling times was assessed with a Medication Event Monitoring System and self-reported compliance with a paper-and-pencil diary. In a randomized controlled study, we estimated whether a disclosure intervention (informing women about objective compliance monitoring) and a reminder intervention (use of acoustical reminders) improved compliance. A mixed model analysis was used to estimate associations between women's objective compliance and their diurnal cortisol profiles, and between deviation from scheduled sampling and the cortisol concentration measured in the related sample.

resultsSelf-reported compliance with a saliva-sampling protocol was 91%, and objective compliance was 70%. The disclosure intervention was associated with improved objective compliance (informed: 81%, noninformed: 60%), F(1,60)  = 17.64, p<0.001, but not the reminder intervention (reminders: 68%, without reminders: 72%), F(1,60) = 0.78, p = 0.379. Furthermore, a woman's increased objective compliance was associated with a higher diurnal cortisol profile, F(2,64)  = 8.22, p<0.001. Altered cortisol levels were observed in less objective compliant samples, F(1,705)  = 7.38, p = 0.007, with delayed sampling associated with lower cortisol levels.

conclusionsThe results suggest that in pregnant women, objective noncompliance with scheduled ambulatory saliva sampling is common and is associated with biased cortisol estimates. To improve sampling compliance, results suggest informing women about objective compliance monitoring but discourage use of acoustical reminders.

Indexed as

Ambulatory CarePatient Acceptance of Health CareSpecimen HandlingAdultBiomarkersFemaleHumansHydrocortisonePregnancySalivaSelf ReportStress, PsychologicalBiomarkersHydrocortisone

Identifiers

PMID24465958
PMCPMC3899170
OpenAlexW2039050377

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.