ArticlePloS one2014
Venous thromboembolism after community-acquired bacteraemia: a 20-year danish cohort study.
Article in PloS one, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.
- Proportion and risk factors for hospital-acquired venous thromboembolism in children: a systematic review and meta-analysis of data from 20 million individuals in 22 countries.Research and practice in thrombosis and haemostasis · 2024Article
- Review
- Venous thromboembolism in critically ill patients with pneumonia in the pre-COVID-19 era: Data from a large public database.Research and practice in thrombosis and haemostasis · 2022Article
- Role of von Willebrand factor in venous thromboembolic disease.JVS-vascular science · 2022Review
- Article
- Acute infection as a trigger for incident venous thromboembolism: Results from a population-based case-crossover study.Research and practice in thrombosis and haemostasis · 2018Article
- Structure, Mechanics, and Instability of Fibrin Clot Infected with Staphylococcus epidermidis.Biophysical journal · 2017Article
- Hospitalization with infection and incident venous thromboembolism: The ARIC study.Thrombosis research · 2017Article
- Risk Assessment and Outcome of Venous Thromboembolism in Pediatric Population in an Academic Care Center of a Low-Middle Income Country.Clinical and applied thrombosis/hemostasis : official journal of the International Academy of Clinical and Applied Thrombosis/HemostasisArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundInfections may increase the risk for venous thromboembolism (VTE), but little is known about VTE risk associated with community-acquired bacteraemia (CAB). We examined the risk for VTE within one year of CAB in comparison to that in matched controls.
methodsWe conducted a population-based cohort study in North Denmark 1992-2011, using data from high-quality health-care databases. We included 4,213 adult CAB patients who had positive blood cultures drawn on the day of hospital admission, 20,084 matched hospitalised controls admitted for other acute medical illness, and 41,121 matched controls from the general population. We computed 0-90 and 91-365 day absolute risks for hospital-diagnosed VTE and used regression analyses with adjustment for confounding factors to compare the risk for VTE in bacteraemia patients and controls.
resultsAmong CAB patients, 1.1% experienced VTE within 90 days of admission and 0.5% during 91-365 days after admission. The adjusted 90-day odds ratio (OR) for VTE was 1.9 (95% CI 1.4-2.7) compared with hospitalised controls, and 23.4 (95% CI 12.9-42.6) compared with population controls. During 91-365 days after CAB admission, the VTE risk remained moderately increased (adjusted hazard ratio vs. hospitalised controls, 1.4; 95% CI 0.8-2.5, and vs. population controls, 1.9; 95% CI 1.0-3.3). Compared to hospitalised controls, the 90-day VTE risk increase was greater for Gram-positive infection (adjusted OR 2.5; 95% CI 1.6-4.1) than for Gram-negative infection (adjusted OR, 1.2; 95% CI 0.7-2.1), partly due to a high risk after Staphylococcus aureus infection (3.6%).
conclusionThe risk for VTE is substantially increased within 90 days after community-acquired bacteraemia when compared to hospitalised controls and population controls. However, the absolute risk of VTE following CAB is low.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.