Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24465860›Full record

SynthesisPloS one2014

Ex-PRESS implantation versus trabeculectomy in open-angle glaucoma: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled clinical trials.

Guohai Chen, Wensheng Li, Fangzheng Jiang, Sihong Mao, Yuhua Tong

Abstract readComparative StudyMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in PloS one, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Device-modified trabeculectomy for glaucoma.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2023
    Pooled it
  2. Device-modified trabeculectomy for glaucoma.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2015
    Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Compared to Trabeculectomy, Ex-PressClinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.) · 2024
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Observational
  18. Article
  19. Factors influencing the filtration-bleb volume after Ex-PRESSClinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.) · 2018
    Article
  20. Ex-PRESS implantation with phacoemulsification in POAG versus CPACG.International journal of ophthalmology · 2017
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Guohai ChenDepartment of Ophthalmology, Quzhou People's Hospital, Quzhou, Zhejiang, PR China.
Wensheng LiXiamen Eye Center of Xiamen University, Xiamen, Fujian, PR China.
Fangzheng JiangDepartment of Ophthalmology, Quzhou People's Hospital, Quzhou, Zhejiang, PR China.
Sihong MaoDepartment of Ophthalmology, Quzhou People's Hospital, Quzhou, Zhejiang, PR China.
Yuhua TongDepartment of Ophthalmology, Quzhou People's Hospital, Quzhou, Zhejiang, PR China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo evaluate the efficacy and safety of Ex-PRESS implantation (Ex-PRESS) compared to trabeculectomy in the treatment of patients with open-angle glaucoma (OAG).

methodsA comprehensive literature search using the Cochrane Methodology Register to identify randomized controlled clinical trials (RCCTs) comparing Ex-PRESS to trabeculectomy in patients with OAG. Efficacy estimates were measured by weighted mean difference (WMD) for the percentage intraocular pressure reduction (IOPR%) from baseline to end-point, and odds ratios (OR) for the complete success rate and postoperative interventions. Safety estimates were measured by OR for postoperative complications. Statistical analysis was performed using the RevMan 5.1 software.

resultsA total of four RCCTs were selected for this meta-analysis, including 215 eyes of 200 patients (110 eyes in the Ex-PRESS group, 105 eyes in the trabeculectomy group). There was no significant difference between Ex-PRESS and trabeculectomy in the IOPR% (WMD = 3.15; 95% confidence interval (CI), -6.17-12.47; P = 0.51). The pooled OR comparing Ex-PRESS to trabeculectomy for the complete success rate at one year after surgery were in favor of Ex-PRESS (OR = 2.93; 95% CI, 1.39-6.16; P = 0.005). The Ex-PRESS procedure was found to be associated with lower number of postoperative interventions (OR = 0.23; 95% CI, 0.07-0.81; P = 0.02) and with a significantly lower frequency of hyphema than trabeculectomy (OR = 0.21; 95% CI, 0.05-0.85; P = 0.03), whereas other complications did not differ statistically.

conclusionIn OAG, Ex-PRESS and trabeculectomy provided similar IOP control, but Ex-PRESS was more likely to achieve complete success, with fewer postoperative interventions. Complication rates were similar for the two types of surgery, except for a lower frequency of hyphema in the Ex-PRESS group.

Indexed as

Glaucoma Drainage ImplantsGlaucoma, Open-AngleHumansIntraocular PressurePostoperative ComplicationsRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicTrabeculectomyTreatment Outcome

Identifiers

PMID24465860
PMCPMC3900454

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.