Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24465539›Full record

ArticlePloS one2014

Mutation analysis of the ERCC4/FANCQ gene in hereditary breast cancer.

Sandra Kohlhase, Natalia V Bogdanova, Peter Schürmann, Marina Bermisheva, Elza Khusnutdinova, Natalia Antonenkova, Tjoung-Won Park-Simon, Peter Hillemanns, Andreas Meyer, Hans Christiansen and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Sandra KohlhaseClinics of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany.
Natalia V BogdanovaClinics of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany ; Clinics of Radiation Oncology, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany.
Peter SchürmannClinics of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany.
Marina BermishevaClinics of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany ; Institute of Biochemistry and Genetics, Ufa, Russia.
Elza KhusnutdinovaInstitute of Biochemistry and Genetics, Ufa, Russia.
Natalia AntonenkovaN.N. Alexandrov Research Institute of Oncology and Medical Radiology, Minsk, Belarus.
Tjoung-Won Park-SimonClinics of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany.
Peter HillemannsClinics of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany.
Andreas MeyerClinics of Radiation Oncology, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany.
Hans ChristiansenClinics of Radiation Oncology, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany.
Detlev SchindlerInstitute of Human Genetics, Biocenter, University of Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany.
Thilo DörkClinics of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany.
Medizinische Hochschule Hannover · DEInstitute of Biochemistry and Genetics of Ufa Scientific Centre · RUN.N. Alexandrov National Cancer Centre · BYUniversity of Würzburg · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The ERCC4 protein forms a structure-specific endonuclease involved in the DNA damage response. Different cancer syndromes such as a subtype of Xeroderma pigmentosum, XPF, and recently a subtype of Fanconi Anemia, FA-Q, have been attributed to biallelic ERCC4 gene mutations. To investigate whether monoallelic ERCC4 gene defects play some role in the inherited component of breast cancer susceptibility, we sequenced the whole ERCC4 coding region and flanking untranslated portions in a series of 101 Byelorussian and German breast cancer patients selected for familial disease (set 1, n = 63) or for the presence of the rs1800067 risk haplotype (set 2, n = 38). This study confirmed six known and one novel exonic variants, including four missense substitutions but no truncating mutation. Missense substitution p.R415Q (rs1800067), a previously postulated breast cancer susceptibility allele, was subsequently screened for in a total of 3,698 breast cancer cases and 2,868 controls from Germany, Belarus or Russia. The Gln415 allele appeared protective against breast cancer in the German series, with the strongest effect for ductal histology (OR 0.67; 95%CI 0.49; 0.92; p = 0.003), but this association was not confirmed in the other two series, with the combined analysis yielding an overall Mantel-Haenszel OR of 0.94 (95% CI 0.81; 1.08). There was no significant effect of p.R415Q on breast cancer survival in the German patient series. The other three detected ERCC4 missense mutations included two known rare variants as well as a novel substitution, p.E17V, that we identified on a p.R415Q haplotype background. The p.E17V mutation is predicted to be probably damaging but was present in just one heterozygous patient. We conclude that the contribution of ERCC4/FANCQ coding mutations to hereditary breast cancer in Central and Eastern Europe is likely to be small.

Indexed as

Genetic Predisposition to DiseaseMutationAdultAllelesBreast NeoplasmsCase-Control StudiesDNA-Binding ProteinsDNA Mutational AnalysisEurope, EasternExonsFemaleGermanyHaplotypesHeterozygoteHumansMiddle AgedDNA-Binding Proteinsxeroderma pigmentosum group F protein

Identifiers

PMID24465539
PMCPMC3897449
OpenAlexW2335374726

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.