Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24465506›Full record

ArticlePloS one2014

Clinical impact of fluoroquinolone-resistant Escherichia coli in the fecal flora of hematological patients with neutropenia and levofloxacin prophylaxis.

Yong Chong, Shinji Shimoda, Hiroko Yakushiji, Yoshikiyo Ito, Takatoshi Aoki, Toshihiro Miyamoto, Tomohiko Kamimura, Nobuyuki Shimono, Koichi Akashi

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Guideline
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Infection Prevention in Transplantation.Current infectious disease reports · 2016
    Article
  11. Escherichia coli: an important pathogen in patients with hematologic malignancies.Mediterranean journal of hematology and infectious diseases · 2014
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Yong ChongMedicine and Biosystemic Science, Kyushu University Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Fukuoka, Japan.
Shinji ShimodaMedicine and Biosystemic Science, Kyushu University Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Fukuoka, Japan.
Hiroko YakushijiDepartment of Clinical Laboratory, Hara-Sanshin Hospital, Fukuoka, Japan.
Yoshikiyo ItoDepartment of Blood and Marrow Transplantation, Hara-Sanshin Hospital, Fukuoka, Japan.
Takatoshi AokiDepartment of Blood and Marrow Transplantation, Hara-Sanshin Hospital, Fukuoka, Japan.
Toshihiro MiyamotoMedicine and Biosystemic Science, Kyushu University Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Fukuoka, Japan.
Tomohiko KamimuraDepartment of Blood and Marrow Transplantation, Hara-Sanshin Hospital, Fukuoka, Japan.
Nobuyuki ShimonoCenter for the Study of Global Infection, Kyushu University Hospital, Fukuoka, Japan.
Koichi AkashiMedicine and Biosystemic Science, Kyushu University Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Fukuoka, Japan.
Kyushu University · JPHarasanshin Hospital · JPKyushu University Hospital · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundFluoroquinolone prophylaxis in patients with neutropenia and hematological malignancies is said to be effective on febrile netropenia (FN)-related infection and mortality; however, the emergence of antibiotic resistance has become a concern. Ciprofloxacin and levofloxacin prophylaxis are most commonly recommended. A significant increase in the rate of quinolone-resistant Escherichia coli in fecal flora has been reported following ciprofloxacin prophylaxis. The acquisition of quinolone-resistant E. coli after levofloxacin use has not been evaluated.

methodsWe prospectively examined the incidence of quinolone-resistant E. coli isolates recovered from stool cultures before and after levofloxacin prophylaxis in patients with neutropenia from August 2011 to May 2013. Some patients received chemotherapy multiple times.

resultsIn this trial, 68 patients were registered. Levofloxacin-resistant E. coli isolates were detected from 11 and 13 of all patients before and after the prophylaxis, respectively. However, this was not statistically significant (P = 0.65). Multiple prophylaxis for sequential chemotherapy did not induce additional quinolone resistance among E. coli isolates. Interestingly, quinolone-resistant E. coli, most of which were extended-spectrum β-lactamase (ESBL) producers, were already detected in approximately 20% of all patients before the initiation of prophylaxis. FN-related bacteremia developed in 2 patients, accompanied by a good prognosis.

conclusionsLevofloxacin prophylaxis for neutropenia did not result in a significant acquisition of quinolone-resistant E. coli. However, we detected previous colonization of quinolone-resistant E. coli before prophylaxis, which possibly reflects the spread of ESBL. The epidemic spread of resistant E. coli as a local factor may influence strategies toward the use of quinolone prophylaxis.

Indexed as

AgedAged, 80 and overAnti-Bacterial AgentsDrug Resistance, BacterialEscherichia coliEscherichia coli InfectionsFebrile NeutropeniaFecesFemaleHematologic NeoplasmsHost-Pathogen InteractionsHumansLevofloxacinMaleMiddle AgedProspective StudiesAnti-Bacterial AgentsLevofloxacin

Identifiers

PMID24465506
PMCPMC3898953
OpenAlexW1988742113

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.