Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24465503›Full record

ArticlePloS one2014

Mobile HIV screening in Cape Town, South Africa: clinical impact, cost and cost-effectiveness.

Ingrid V Bassett, Darshini Govindasamy, Alison S Erlwanger, Emily P Hyle, Katharina Kranzer, Nienke van Schaik, Farzad Noubary, A David Paltiel, Robin Wood, Rochelle P Walensky and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 46 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
46citing papers in PubMed, 6 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

46 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Ingrid V BassettDivision of Infectious Disease, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, United States of America ; Division of General Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, United States of America ; Medical Practice Evaluation Center, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, United States of America ; Harvard University Center for AIDS Research (CFAR), Boston, Massachusetts, United States of America.
Darshini GovindasamyDesmond Tutu HIV Centre, Institute of Infectious Disease and Molecular Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa.
Alison S ErlwangerDivision of General Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, United States of America ; Medical Practice Evaluation Center, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, United States of America.
Emily P HyleDivision of Infectious Disease, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, United States of America ; Division of General Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, United States of America ; Medical Practice Evaluation Center, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, United States of America.
Katharina KranzerDepartment of Infectious Disease Epidemiology, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom.
Nienke van SchaikDesmond Tutu HIV Centre, Institute of Infectious Disease and Molecular Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa.
Farzad NoubaryThe Institute for Clinical Research and Health Policy Studies, Tufts Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts, United States of America ; Tufts Clinical and Translational Science Institute, Tufts University, Boston, Massachusetts, United States of America.
A David PaltielDepartment of Health Policy and Management, Yale School of Public Health, New Haven, Connecticut, United States of America.
Robin WoodDesmond Tutu HIV Centre, Institute of Infectious Disease and Molecular Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa ; Department of Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa.
Rochelle P WalenskyDivision of Infectious Disease, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, United States of America ; Division of General Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, United States of America ; Medical Practice Evaluation Center, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, United States of America ; Harvard University Center for AIDS Research (CFAR), Boston, Massachusetts, United States of America ; Division of Infectious Disease, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, United States of America.
Elena LosinaDivision of Infectious Disease, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, United States of America ; Division of General Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, United States of America ; Medical Practice Evaluation Center, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, United States of America ; Harvard University Center for AIDS Research (CFAR), Boston, Massachusetts, United States of America ; Departments of Biostatistics and Epidemiology, Boston University School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts, United States of America ; Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, United States of America.
Linda-Gail BekkerDesmond Tutu HIV Centre, Institute of Infectious Disease and Molecular Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa.
Kenneth A FreedbergDivision of Infectious Disease, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, United States of America ; Division of General Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, United States of America ; Medical Practice Evaluation Center, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, United States of America ; Harvard University Center for AIDS Research (CFAR), Boston, Massachusetts, United States of America ; Departments of Biostatistics and Epidemiology, Boston University School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts, United States of America ; Department of Health Policy and Management, Harvard School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts, United States of America.

Funding

The impact of HIV viral diversity and cellular immunity on HIV pathogenesisP30AI060354 · NIAID · HARVARD UNIVERSITY (MEDICAL SCHOOL) · PI ROBERT A. PARKER · 2004 to 2026
$94.4M
Using Coincidence Analysis to Investigate Factors Affecting PrEP Initiation and Continuation in Southern ending the Epidemic CountiesP30MH062294 · NIMH · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI John Edward Pachankis · 2001 to 2026
$48.5M
University of Cape Town Clinical Trials Unit (UCTCTU)UM1AI069519 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF CAPE TOWN · PI Linda-Gail Bekker · 2012 to 2026
$36.3M
Optimizing HIV Care in Less Developed CountriesR01AI058736 · NIAID · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI Kenneth Alan Freedberg, Emily Parker Hyle · 2004 to 2026
$21.5M
PROGRAM FOR AIDS CLINICAL RESEARCH TRAINING (PACRT)T32AI007433 · NIAID · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI MARK J SIEDNER · 1992 to 2026
$11.4M
Novel Methods to Inform HIV/TB Clinical Trial DevelopmentR01AI093269 · NIAID · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI REDDY, KRISHNA P · 2011 to 2024
$6.8M
Cape Town Clinical Trials Unit (CT-CTU) for HIV/AIDS Prevention & TreatmentU01AI069519 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF CAPE TOWN · PI WOOD, ROBIN · 2007 to 2011
$4.6M
Optimizing strategies for universal HIV testingR01MH073445 · NIMH · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI WALENSKY, ROCHELLE P. · 2006 to 2010
$3.3M
Linkage & Retention: A Randomized Trial to Optimize HIV/TB Care in South AfricaR01MH090326 · NIMH · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI BASSETT, INGRID VALERIE · 2010 to 2014
$2.9M
NIAID NIH HHS P30 AI060354NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI058736NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI093269NIAID NIH HHS T32 AI007433NIAID NIH HHS UM1 AI069519NIMH NIH HHS P30 MH062294NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH073445NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH090326PEPFAR
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMobile HIV screening may facilitate early HIV diagnosis. Our objective was to examine the cost-effectiveness of adding a mobile screening unit to current medical facility-based HIV testing in Cape Town, South Africa. METHODS AND

findingsWe used the Cost Effectiveness of Preventing AIDS Complications International (CEPAC-I) computer simulation model to evaluate two HIV screening strategies in Cape Town: 1) medical facility-based testing (the current standard of care) and 2) addition of a mobile HIV-testing unit intervention in the same community. Baseline input parameters were derived from a Cape Town-based mobile unit that tested 18,870 individuals over 2 years: prevalence of previously undiagnosed HIV (6.6%), mean CD4 count at diagnosis (males 423/µL, females 516/µL), CD4 count-dependent linkage to care rates (males 31%-58%, females 49%-58%), mobile unit intervention cost (includes acquisition, operation and HIV test costs, $29.30 per negative result and $31.30 per positive result). We conducted extensive sensitivity analyses to evaluate input uncertainty. Model outcomes included site of HIV diagnosis, life expectancy, medical costs, and the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of the intervention compared to medical facility-based testing. We considered the intervention to be "very cost-effective" when the ICER was less than South Africa's annual per capita Gross Domestic Product (GDP) ($8,200 in 2012). We projected that, with medical facility-based testing, the discounted (undiscounted) HIV-infected population life expectancy was 132.2 (197.7) months; this increased to 140.7 (211.7) months with the addition of the mobile unit. The ICER for the mobile unit was $2,400/year of life saved (YLS). Results were most sensitive to the previously undiagnosed HIV prevalence, linkage to care rates, and frequency of HIV testing at medical facilities.

conclusionThe addition of mobile HIV screening to current testing programs can improve survival and be very cost-effective in South Africa and other resource-limited settings, and should be a priority.

Indexed as

Mobile Health UnitsAcquired Immunodeficiency SyndromeAdultAnti-Retroviral AgentsCD4 Lymphocyte CountCost-Benefit AnalysisFemaleHealth Care CostsHIV InfectionsHumansLogistic ModelsMaleMass ScreeningOutcome Assessment, Health CarePrevalenceSouth AfricaAnti-Retroviral Agents

Identifiers

PMID24465503
PMCPMC3898963

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.