Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24465406›Full record

ArticlePloS one2014

Nitrous oxide production in sputum from cystic fibrosis patients with chronic Pseudomonas aeruginosa lung infection.

Mette Kolpen, Michael Kühl, Thomas Bjarnsholt, Claus Moser, Christine Rønne Hansen, Lars Liengaard, Arsalan Kharazmi, Tanja Pressler, Niels Høiby, Peter Østrup Jensen

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 60 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
60citing papers in PubMed
9.9field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

60 citing papers in PubMed, 98 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Widespread detoxifying NO reductases impart a distinct isotopic fingerprint on NProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Targeting Anaerobic Respiration inAdvances in wound care · 2024
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Tolerance and resistance of microbial biofilms.Nature reviews. Microbiology · 2022
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Mette KolpenDepartment of Clinical Microbiology, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark ; Department of International Health, Immunology and Microbiology, Faculty of Health Sciences University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Michael KühlMarine Biological Section, Department of Biology, University of Copenhagen, Helsingør, Denmark ; Plant Functional Biology and Climate Change Cluster, University of Technology Sydney, Sydney, Australia ; Singapore Centre on Environmental Life Sciences Engineering, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore, Singapore.
Thomas BjarnsholtDepartment of Clinical Microbiology, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark ; Department of International Health, Immunology and Microbiology, Faculty of Health Sciences University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Claus MoserDepartment of Clinical Microbiology, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Christine Rønne HansenCopenhagen CF Centre, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Lars LiengaardMarine Biological Section, Department of Biology, University of Copenhagen, Helsingør, Denmark.
Arsalan KharazmiDepartment of Clinical Microbiology, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Tanja PresslerCopenhagen CF Centre, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Niels HøibyDepartment of Clinical Microbiology, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark ; Department of International Health, Immunology and Microbiology, Faculty of Health Sciences University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Peter Østrup JensenDepartment of Clinical Microbiology, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Rigshospitalet · DKUniversity of Copenhagen · DKUniversity of Technology Sydney · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Chronic lung infection by Pseudomonas aeruginosa is the major severe complication in cystic fibrosis (CF) patients, where P. aeruginosa persists and grows in biofilms in the endobronchial mucus under hypoxic conditions. Numerous polymorphonuclear leukocytes (PMNs) surround the biofilms and create local anoxia by consuming the majority of O2 for production of reactive oxygen species (ROS). We hypothesized that P. aeruginosa acquires energy for growth in anaerobic endobronchial mucus by denitrification, which can be demonstrated by production of nitrous oxide (N2O), an intermediate in the denitrification pathway. We measured N2O and O2 with electrochemical microsensors in 8 freshly expectorated sputum samples from 7 CF patients with chronic P. aeruginosa infection. The concentrations of NO3(-) and NO2(-) in sputum were estimated by the Griess reagent. We found a maximum median concentration of 41.8 µM N2O (range 1.4-157.9 µM N2O). The concentration of N2O in the sputum was higher below the oxygenated layers. In 4 samples the N2O concentration increased during the initial 6 h of measurements before decreasing for approximately 6 h. Concomitantly, the concentration of NO3(-) decreased in sputum during 24 hours of incubation. We demonstrate for the first time production of N2O in clinical material from infected human airways indicating pathogenic metabolism based on denitrification. Therefore, P. aeruginosa may acquire energy for growth by denitrification in anoxic endobronchial mucus in CF patients. Such ability for anaerobic growth may be a hitherto ignored key aspect of chronic P. aeruginosa infections that can inform new strategies for treatment and prevention.

Indexed as

AdultBiosensing TechniquesChronic DiseaseCystic FibrosisDemographyFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedNitratesNitritesNitrous OxideOxygenPseudomonas aeruginosaPseudomonas InfectionsSputumNitratesNitritesNitrous OxideOxygen

Identifiers

PMID24465406
PMCPMC3894955
OpenAlexW2104118234

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.