Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24465404›Full record

SynthesisPloS one2014

Qualitative meta-synthesis of user experience of computerised therapy for depression and anxiety.

Sarah E Knowles, Gill Toms, Caroline Sanders, Penny Bee, Karina Lovell, Stefan Rennick-Egglestone, David Coyle, Catriona M Kennedy, Elizabeth Littlewood, David Kessler and 2 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in PloS one, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03524196 (Understanding What is Helpful and Unhelpful in Intervention With Online Relational Agent MYLO), which is not on this map. Cited by 93 papers, 11 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
93citing papers in PubMed, 11 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03524196 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2018, after this paper: background citation

Understanding What is Helpful and Unhelpful in Intervention With Online Relational Agent MYLO: An Intervention Process Study.

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of ManchesterRan2018 to 2019Enrolled17ConditionsPsychologicalArmsManage Your Life Online (MYLO)
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

93 citing papers in PubMed, 11 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Pooled it
  9. Pooled it
  10. Pooled it
  11. Pooled it
  12. Trial
  13. Trial
  14. Trial
  15. Trial
  16. Trial
  17. Trial
  18. Trial
  19. Trial
  20. Trial

33 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Sarah E KnowlesNIHR School for Primary Care Research, Centre for Primary Care, University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom.
Gill TomsNIHR School for Primary Care Research, Centre for Primary Care, University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom.
Caroline SandersNIHR School for Primary Care Research, Centre for Primary Care, University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom.
Penny BeeSchool of Nursing, Midwifery and Social Work, University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom.
Karina LovellSchool of Nursing, Midwifery and Social Work, University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom.
Stefan Rennick-EgglestoneMixed Reality Lab, School of Computer Science, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, United Kingdom.
David CoyleDepartment of Computer Science, University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom.
Catriona M KennedySchool of Computer Science, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom.
Elizabeth LittlewoodMental Health & Addictions Research Group, University of York, York, United Kingdom.
David KesslerSchool of Social and Community Medicine, University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom.
Simon GilbodyMental Health & Addictions Research Group, University of York, York, United Kingdom.
Peter BowerNIHR School for Primary Care Research, Centre for Primary Care, University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom.

Funding

Department of Health 06/43/05Department of Health HTA/06/43/504Medical Research Council G0401181
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveComputerised therapies play an integral role in efforts to improve access to psychological treatment for patients with depression and anxiety. However, despite recognised problems with uptake, there has been a lack of investigation into the barriers and facilitators of engagement. We aimed to systematically review and synthesise findings from qualitative studies of computerised therapies, in order to identify factors impacting on engagement.

methodSystematic review and meta-synthesis of qualitative studies of user experiences of computer delivered therapy for depression and/or anxiety.

results8 studies were included in the review. All except one were of desktop based cognitive behavioural treatments. Black and minority ethnic and older participants were underrepresented, and only one study addressed users with a co-morbid physical health problem. Through synthesis, we identified two key overarching concepts, regarding the need for treatments to be sensitive to the individual, and the dialectal nature of user experience, with different degrees of support and anonymity experienced as both positive and negative. We propose that these factors can be conceptually understood as the 'non-specific' or 'common' factors of computerised therapy, analogous to but distinct from the common factors of traditional face-to-face therapies.

conclusionExperience of computerised therapy could be improved through personalisation and sensitisation of content to individual users, recognising the need for users to experience a sense of 'self' in the treatment which is currently absent. Exploiting the common factors of computerised therapy, through enhancing perceived connection and collaboration, could offer a way of reconciling tensions due to the dialectal nature of user experience. Future research should explore whether the findings are generalisable to other patient groups, to other delivery formats (such as mobile technology) and other treatment modalities beyond cognitive behaviour therapy. The proposed model could aid the development of enhancements to current packages to improve uptake and support engagement.

Indexed as

Therapy, Computer-AssistedAnxietyDepressionHumans

Identifiers

PMID24465404
PMCPMC3894944

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.