Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24465236›Full record

ArticleGenomics & informatics2013

Somatic mutaome profile in human cancer tissues.

Nayoung Kim, Yourae Hong, Doyoung Kwon, Sukjoon Yoon

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genomics & informatics, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 54 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
54citing papers in PubMed
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

54 citing papers in PubMed, 80 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. [MUC16: The Novel Target for Tumor Therapy].Zhongguo fei ai za zhi = Chinese journal of lung cancer · 2022
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Effect ofAmerican journal of translational research · 2022
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Nayoung KimDepartment of Biological Sciences, Center for Advanced Bioinformatics and Systems Medicine, Sookmyung Women's University, Seoul 140-742, Korea.
Yourae HongDepartment of Biological Sciences, Center for Advanced Bioinformatics and Systems Medicine, Sookmyung Women's University, Seoul 140-742, Korea.
Doyoung KwonDepartment of Biological Sciences, Center for Advanced Bioinformatics and Systems Medicine, Sookmyung Women's University, Seoul 140-742, Korea.
Sukjoon YoonDepartment of Biological Sciences, Center for Advanced Bioinformatics and Systems Medicine, Sookmyung Women's University, Seoul 140-742, Korea.
Sookmyung Women's University · KR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Somatic mutation is a major cause of cancer progression and varied responses of tumors against anticancer agents. Thus, we must obtain and characterize genome-wide mutational profiles in individual cancer subtypes. The Cancer Genome Atlas database includes large amounts of sequencing and omics data generated from diverse human cancer tissues. In the present study, we integrated and analyzed the exome sequencing data from ~3,000 tissue samples and summarized the major mutant genes in each of the diverse cancer subtypes and stages. Mutations were observed in most human genes (~23,000 genes) with low frequency from an analysis of 11 major cancer subtypes. The majority of tissue samples harbored 20-80 different mutant genes, on average. Lung cancer samples showed a greater number of mutations in diverse genes than other cancer subtypes. Only a few genes were mutated with over 5% frequency in tissue samples. Interestingly, mutation frequency was generally similar between non-metastatic and metastastic samples in most cancer subtypes. Among the 12 major mutations, the TP53, USH2A, TTN, and MUC16 genes were found to be frequent in most cancer types, while BRAF, FRG1B, PBRM1, and VHL showed lineage-specific mutation patterns. The present study provides a useful resource to understand the broad spectrum of mutation frequencies in various cancer types.

Indexed as

human tissue samplesmetastasismutation frequencyTCGA

Identifiers

PMID24465236
PMCPMC3897852
OpenAlexW1969626557

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.