ArticlePLoS computational biology2014
Combinatorial modeling of chromatin features quantitatively predicts DNA replication timing in Drosophila.
Article in PLoS computational biology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.
- Soffritto: a deep learning model for predicting high-resolution replication timing.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2025Article
- Genome-wide prediction of topoisomerase IIβ binding by architectural factors and chromatin accessibility.PLoS computational biology · 2021Article
- Dissection of acute stimulus-inducible nucleosome remodeling in mammalian cells.Genes & development · 2019Article
- Article
- Accurate Recycling of Parental Histones Reproduces the Histone Modification Landscape during DNA Replication.Molecular cell · 2018Article
- Similarity in replication timing between polytene and diploid cells is associated with the organization of the Drosophila genome.PloS one · 2018Article
- Limb-Enhancer Genie: An accessible resource of accurate enhancer predictions in the developing limb.PLoS computational biology · 2017Article
- High-resolution profiling of Drosophila replication start sites reveals a DNA shape and chromatin signature of metazoan origins.Cell reports · 2015Article
- Specific modifications of histone tails, but not DNA methylation, mirror the temporal variation of mammalian recombination hotspots.Genome biology and evolution · 2014Article
- Chromatin structure and replication origins: determinants of chromosome replication and nuclear organization.Journal of molecular biology · 2014Review
- Replicon: a software to accurately predict DNA replication timing in metazoan cells.Frontiers in genetics · 2014Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In metazoans, each cell type follows a characteristic, spatio-temporally regulated DNA replication program. Histone modifications (HMs) and chromatin binding proteins (CBPs) are fundamental for a faithful progression and completion of this process. However, no individual HM is strictly indispensable for origin function, suggesting that HMs may act combinatorially in analogy to the histone code hypothesis for transcriptional regulation. In contrast to gene expression however, the relationship between combinations of chromatin features and DNA replication timing has not yet been demonstrated. Here, by exploiting a comprehensive data collection consisting of 95 CBPs and HMs we investigated their combinatorial potential for the prediction of DNA replication timing in Drosophila using quantitative statistical models. We found that while combinations of CBPs exhibit moderate predictive power for replication timing, pairwise interactions between HMs lead to accurate predictions genome-wide that can be locally further improved by CBPs. Independent feature importance and model analyses led us to derive a simplified, biologically interpretable model of the relationship between chromatin landscape and replication timing reaching 80% of the full model accuracy using six model terms. Finally, we show that pairwise combinations of HMs are able to predict differential DNA replication timing across different cell types. All in all, our work provides support to the existence of combinatorial HM patterns for DNA replication and reveal cell-type independent key elements thereof, whose experimental investigation might contribute to elucidate the regulatory mode of this fundamental cellular process.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.